Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Changes in the Design of Simultaneous Elections after Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Implications for Constitutional Democracy and the Law-Making Authority Wiredarme
International Journal of Scientific Research Vol. 3 No. 01 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Hisnul Muslim Lombok

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62894/hfvgme35

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the redesign of simultaneous elections after Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 and its implications for constitutional democracy and the law-making authority in Indonesia. The issue is important because the decision changes the electoral simultaneity model by separating national elections from local elections, thereby affecting democratic representation, electoral management, legislative discretion, and the institutional role of the Constitutional Court. This study uses a qualitative legal research method with a normative-juridical approach. The analysis applies statutory, case, and conceptual approaches by examining the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, election laws, regional election laws, Constitutional Court decisions, and recent scholarly literature on electoral design, constitutional democracy, judicial review, and legislative authority. The findings show that Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 represents a constitutional reorientation of electoral simultaneity from a single-day five-ballot model into a differentiated electoral architecture. The separation of national and local elections may strengthen democratic participation, reduce electoral complexity, improve the visibility of local issues, and support more meaningful representation. Yet the decision also narrows legislative discretion and creates transitional challenges regarding electoral scheduling, office terms, legal certainty, and institutional readiness. This study contributes by framing the decision as constitutional electoral engineering that must be followed by transparent, participatory, and accountable legislative reform.
Quadruple Helix-Based Early Warning System for Socio-Religious Conflict in East Lombok Wiredarme; Muhammad Suhardi; Abdul Wahab
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): August
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v6i3.2860

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the early warning system for socio-religious conflict in East Lombok Regency, identify barriers to Quadruple Helix collaboration, and formulate a contextual and implementable model for strengthening early conflict detection. This research employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving local government officials, district and village authorities, academics, local media, and religious organization leaders. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key patterns related to the existing early warning system, collaboration barriers, and the required strengthening model. The findings show that the early warning system for socio-religious conflict in East Lombok has operated through territorial networks, social communication, community reports, the role of religious leaders, and the intelligence network of the National Unity and Politics Agency at the village level. However, the system has not yet been fully institutionalized, as it lacks standardized reporting mechanisms, an integrated database, risk classification, and regular cross-actor analytical forums. The main barriers include structural barriers in the form of institutional fragmentation, cultural barriers related to strong sensitivity toward religious symbols and intergroup prejudice, and coordinative barriers caused by the absence of a permanent collaborative forum. This study recommends a Socio-Religious Early Warning Model based on Quadruple Helix and Social Resilience, integrating the roles of government, academia, media, and civil society through early monitoring, information validation, risk classification, preventive intervention, public communication, evaluation, and social recovery. This model emphasizes that conflict prevention cannot rely solely on a security-based approach, but must connect administrative legality, social legitimacy, academic analysis, public communication, and community participation.