Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Fitokimia Berbasis GC-MS dan Evaluasi Aktivitas Antioksidan Metode DPPH dari Ekstrak Etanol dan N-Heksan Daun Bidara (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) Maharani Zahra; Rahma Yulia; Syarifah Nadia; Bunga Rimta Barus
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Sciences JPS Volume 9 Nomor 2 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Tjut Nyak Dhien

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36490/journal-jps.com.v9i2.1146

Abstract

Background: The increasing public interest in herbal medicine which is safer and rarely causes side effects has made people use more natural ingredients as a source of bioactive compounds. One promising plant is the bidara leaf (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.), known for its rich supply of secondary metabolites, including alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, and terpenoids, which boast pharmacological benefits, especially in their role as antioxidants. Objective: This research is conducted to determine the phytochemical compounds and examine the antioxidant potential of bidara leaf extracts prepared with ethanol and n-hexane, using experimental method. Methods: The extraction was done through maceration using 96% ethanol and n-hexane as solvents, and then we analyzed the phytochemicals via phytochemical screening and GC-MS. For checking antioxidant activity, we used the DPPH method, which involved figuring out the maximum wavelength, the operating time, measuring absorbance, and calculating the IC50 value. Results: From the phytochemical analysis, it turned out that ethanol extracts of bidara leaves feature a richer array of bioactive compounds, including alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, and terpenoids or steroids, in contrast to the n-hexane extracts, which only include alkaloids, glycosides, and terpenoids or steroids. Analysis using GC-MS identified that the ethanol extract was dominated by fatty acid ester compounds, including methyl palmitate and methyl oleate, while the n-hexane extract contained non-polar compounds such as squalene and tetratetracontane. Through the DPPH approach, the antioxidant activity of ethanol and n-hexane extracts was demonstrated by IC₅₀ values of 4.488 µg/mL and 7.54 µg/mL, respectively, both of which are classified as very strong, although still lower than vitamin C, which has an IC₅₀ of 2.47 µg/mL. Conclusion: The analysis indicates that the ethanol extract exhibits stronger antioxidant activity compared to the n-hexane extract.
Efek Dosis–Respons Ekstrak Etanol Daun Cayratia trifolia Linn. pada Edema Kaki Tikus Terinduksi Karagenan Muzakkir Muzakkir; Bunga Rimta Barus; Meutia Indriana; Salman Salman
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Sciences JPS Volume 9 Nomor 3 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Tjut Nyak Dhien

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36490/journal-jps.com.v9i3.1798

Abstract

Introduction: Leaves of Cayratia trifolia Linn. contain several secondary metabolites with potential anti-inflammatory activity. However, evidence regarding the dose–response relationship of their ethanolic extract in acute inflammation remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity and dose–response trend of Cayratia trifolia leaf ethanolic extract (CTLEE) in a carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model. Methods: Twenty-five male rats (Rattus norvegicus) were divided into five groups (n=5): a 0.5% Na-CMC negative control, a 0.2% diclofenac sodium positive control, and CTLEE treatment groups receiving 100, 200, or 300 mg/kg body weight. Treatments were administered orally, followed 30 min later by an intraplantar injection of 0.1 mL of 1% carrageenan. Paw volume was measured every 60 min for 360 min using a digital plethysmometer. Data were expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (p<0.05p<0.05p<0.05). Results: CTLEE reduced paw oedema relative to the negative control and showed a trend toward greater activity as the dose increased. At 360 min, edema percentages were 38.25 ± 11.88%, 29.21 ± 5.36%, and 24.43 ± 6.60% for CTLEE at 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg, respectively, compared with 74.83 ± 13.77% in the negative-control group. The corresponding inhibition values were 48.74 ± 12.10%, 60.24 ± 8.57%, and 65.43 ± 13.96%. Significant differences in paw edema were observed among groups at all assessment times (p<0.001p<0.001p<0.001). Conclusion: CTLEE demonstrated anti-inflammatory activity with a dose-related trend. The 300 mg/kg dose produced the greatest edema reduction and inhibition among the tested extract doses; however, therapeutic equivalence with diclofenac sodium was not established.