Jibran Hafidz
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Batasan Hak Imunitas Advokat dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Obstruction of Justice Muhammad Ulul Azmi; Jibran Hafidz; Pangky Fauz Firjatullah; Musleh Harry
CONSTITUO : Jurnal Riset Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Vol 5 No 1 (2026): CONSTITUO Jurnal Riset Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Islam (Siyasah Syar'iyyah) STAIN Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/constituo.v5i1.6436

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis batas hak imunitas advokat dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi terkait obstruction of justice serta peran kode etik dan organisasi profesi dalam menilai dugaan pelanggaran advokat. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hak imunitas advokat berdasarkan Pasal 16 Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/PUU-XI/2013 merupakan perlindungan hukum yang berlaku sepanjang advokat bertindak dengan itikad baik, sesuai kode etik, dan dalam koridor hukum. Hak imunitas dapat gugur apabila advokat melakukan tindakan yang menghambat proses peradilan, seperti memanipulasi bukti atau memengaruhi saksi. Penelitian ini juga menegaskan pentingnya mekanisme pemeriksaan etik oleh organisasi profesi untuk mencegah kriminalisasi advokat sekaligus menjaga integritas profesi dan proses peradilan.
The Legal Status of Digital Assets as Inheritance Objects from the Perspective of Islamic Inheritance Law Jibran Hafidz
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 10 No 2 (2026): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v10i2.26464

Abstract

The development of digital technology has transformed the concept of property ownership, including the emergence of digital assets such as cryptocurrency, NFTs, electronic wallets, and digital accounts with economic value. This phenomenon raises legal issues in Islamic inheritance law, particularly regarding whether digital assets can be classified as objects of inheritance. This study aims to analyze the legality of digital assets as objects of inheritance from the perspective of Islamic inheritance law. The method used in this study is library research with a conceptual approach through an examination of legal doctrines, principles of Islamic inheritance, and contemporary literature on digital assets. The findings indicate that digital assets may be positioned as objects of inheritance if they fulfill the elements of al-māl, namely having economic value, being lawfully owned, being beneficial, being transferable, and not contradicting sharia principles. Digital assets may also fall within the category of tirkah if their ownership, value, and access can be clearly proven. However, certain types of digital assets, particularly cryptocurrency, require careful assessment because they are highly volatile and may potentially contain elements of gharar, dharar, and qimar. Therefore, the legality of digital assets as objects of inheritance is not absolute, but depends on the validity of ownership, the clarity of the object, lawful benefit, and the possibility of technical access by the heirs.