Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Al-Dustur Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum
Saidah
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Nikah Muhallil dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia Kesenjangan antara Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Prinsip Maqashid Syariah Subhan; Rusdaya Basri; Zainal Said; Fikri; Saidah; Nur Hazmi Asyikin
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.6493

Abstract

Praktik nikah muhallil (perkawinan yang bertujuan menghalalkan bekas suami setelah talak tiga) masih menjadi persoalan kontroversial dalam hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia. Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) sebagai hukum positif yang mengatur perkawinan umat Islam di Indonesia tidak mengatur praktik ini secara tegas, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan kesenjangan normatif dengan tujuan luhur syariat (maqashid al-syariah). Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis status hukum nikah muhallil dalam hukum positif Indonesia, khususnya KHI, serta mengkaji kesenjangan normatif antara KHI dan prinsip maqashid al-syariah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan filosofis. Bahan hukum primer meliputi Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI), literatur fikih klasik empat mazhab, serta Fatwa MUI Nomor 3 Tahun 2021. Bahan hukum sekunder berupa jurnal nasional terakreditasi dan jurnal internasional bereputasi dari sepuluh tahun terakhir. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KHI tidak secara tegas melarang nikah muhallil. Pasal 39 KHI hanya mendeskripsikan syarat formil perkawinan setelah talak tiga tanpa mengatur niat di baliknya. Kekosongan hukum ini menyebabkan disparitas putusan hakim dan membuka peluang manipulasi hukum. Lebih lanjut, nikah muhallil bertentangan dengan maqashid al-syariah, terutama perlindungan keturunan (hifzh al-nasl) dan pencegahan kerusakan (dar'u al-mafasid). Kesenjangan antara KHI dan maqashid mengindikasikan bahwa hukum positif Indonesia belum sepenuhnya menginternalisasi nilai-nilai substantif hukum Islam. Kesimpulan menekankan urgensi reformasi hukum untuk secara eksplisit melarang nikah muhallil dan menyelaraskan Kompilasi Hukum Islam dengan prinsip maqashid al-syariah.
FROM MEDIATION TO ADVOCACY: POST-DIVORCE WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT THROUGH RELIGIOUS COURT PRACTICES IN SOUTH SULAWESI, INDONESIA Saidah; Badruzzaman; Nur Afiah; Luthfiah. M; Nur Awaliyah
Jurnal Al-Dustur Vol 9 No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/aldustur.v9i1.11184

Abstract

This study investigates the transformation of court-based mediation from a dispute resolution mechanism into an advocacy-oriented legal strategy for women’s empowerment after divorce in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Using a qualitative field research design, the study examines how mediators within the Religious Court system facilitate women’s access to post-divorce rights, address power imbalances during mediation, and link legal procedures with psychosocial and economic support networks. Data were generated through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis involving mediators, divorced women, judges, legal practitioners, government officials, and civil society organizations. The findings demonstrate that mediators increasingly operate as legal-humanist advocates who translate complex legal norms into accessible knowledge, create safer and more equitable negotiation spaces, and mitigate structural vulnerabilities stemming from low legal literacy, economic dependency, and persistent social stigma. Three key contributions of court-based mediation are identified: legal empowerment through rights clarification, gender-sensitive mediation that rebalances unequal power relations, and cross-sector referrals that enhance women’s resilience and post-divorce autonomy. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of these practices remains limited by systemic constraints, including fragmented institutional authority, procedural rigidity, and weak post-judgment enforcement, which often produce legal alienation and undermine women’s advocacy capacity. The study argues that sustainable post-divorce empowerment requires the institutionalization of integrated advocacy models within the court system and concludes by highlighting the importance of cross-sector collaboration through a “closing the loop” framework connecting mediators, legal aid institutions, and women’s protection agencies, alongside reforms in mediator training to incorporate post-judgment advocacy as a core competency.
Co-Authors Badruzzaman Fikri Luthfiah. M Nur Afiah Nur Awaliyah Nur Hazmi Asyikin Rusdaya Basri, Rusdaya Subhan Zainal Said