Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga PESHUM Taushiah: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Kemasyarakatan
Didi Sumardi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Diversi Berdasarkan Pasal 6 dan 7 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Aldi Bahtiar; Deden Najmudin; Didi Sumardi
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4: Juni 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i4.16895

Abstract

The implementation of diversion under Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA), particularly Articles 6 and 7, faces a gap between its normative restorative ideals and practical enforcement. Meanwhile, the perspective of Islamic criminal law, through the concepts of taklīf and tamyīz, offers a more precise gradation of children’s criminal responsibility. This study addresses the gap in integrative analysis between these two legal systems in order to achieve substantive justice for children in conflict with the law. This research employs a normative juridical approach with comparative analysis, utilizing primary data (the UU SPPA, Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2014, and 15 court decisions from 2020–2025) and secondary data (fiqh jināyah literature and reports from ICJR and KPAI). The analysis is qualitative, descriptive-analytical in nature, applying statute, case, and conceptual approaches to compare positive legal norms with the principles of maṣlaḥah and ta’dīb. The provisions of Articles 6 and 7 have been effective in reducing recidivism by 25% and shortening detention periods, aligning with the Islamic concept of ta’dībiyyah for mumayyiz children. However, implementation remains constrained by formalistic practices within correctional institutions (Bapas) and resistance from victims. A strong correlation with the concept of ṣulḥ (Qur’an 49:9–10) produces a more holistic form of justice, although the statutory age gradation remains less flexible compared to the doctrine of tamyīz. The synergy between the UU SPPA and Islamic criminal law thus generates an inclusive restorative juvenile justice model consistent with the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah
Tindak Pidana Cyberbullying Terhadap Anak Melalui Platform Tiktok Perspektif UU ITE dan Hukum Pidana Islam Farhan Mardiansah; Didi Sumardi; Yusup Azazy
Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026): Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman (In Press)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kerinci, Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/islamika.v26i1.7030

Abstract

The rapid expansion of TikTok has simultaneously expanded social interaction and heightened the risk of cyberbullying targeting minors. This study examines cyberbullying in the form of physical mockery in TikTok comment sections using the case of Betrand Peto Putra Onsu as a concrete illustration through two complementary normative frameworks: Law Number 19 of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) and Islamic Criminal Law (fiqh jinayah). Normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative law approaches was employed. Findings indicate that physical defamation in TikTok comment sections satisfies the elements of Article 27(3) of the ITE Law and qualifies as jarimah ta'zir under Islamic criminal law. The applicable ta'zir sanction is flexible yet firm, encompassing financial penalties, imprisonment, and victim restoration as an inseparable whole. The study recommends synergy between positive legal instruments and Islamic legal values to strengthen child protection in digital spaces.
Sanksi Pidana Pelaku Jual Beli Kendaraan Hasil Curian Dalam Pasal 480 KUHP Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Rayhan Maulana Muhamad; Didi Sumardi; Deden Najmudin
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i3.12156

Abstract

Motor vehicle theft remains a prevalent property crime in Indonesia, with stolen goods often distributed through third parties acting as sellers or receivers (penadah). Under Article 480 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), such acts constitute the offense of receiving stolen goods, punishable by up to four years’ imprisonment or a fine of nine hundred rupiahs. In Islamic criminal law, selling stolen goods is haram and classified as jarimah ta’zir, with sanctions determined by the ruler (ulil amri) for public benefit. This study analyzes sanctions against sellers of stolen motor vehicles from the perspectives of Article 480 KUHP and Islamic criminal law, and examines their relevance. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study draws on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The findings show that, despite different philosophical foundations, both legal systems aim to protect property (hifz al-mal) and maintain public order. Their relevance lies in similar sanctions—primarily imprisonment and the authority of judges or the government to impose punishments proportionate to the offense’s severity and societal impact.
Criminal Sanctions for the Sale of Human Organs Under Article 124 Paragraph 3 of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health Muhammad Zulfikri Mustakim; Enceng Arif Faizal; Didi Sumardi
Taushiah: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol 16, No 1 (2026): Taushiah: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Kemasyarakatan
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/taushiah.v16i1.13647

Abstract

Human organ trafficking is a form of crime that contradicts humanitarian principles, positive law, and Islamic values. As an evolving criminal phenomenon, this offense requires a comprehensive legal analysis, including from the perspective of Islamic criminal law. This study aims to analyze the constituent elements of the crime of human organ trafficking and examine the classification of sanctions applicable under Islamic criminal law. The research employs a normative juridical method using both statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through a library research method encompassing legislation, legal literature, scholarly journals, and other relevant sources, which were subsequently analyzed using a descriptive-analytical technique. The findings indicate that human organ trafficking fulfills the elements of criminal liability and, from the perspective of Islamic criminal law, is classified as jarimah taʿzir because no specific sanction for this offense is explicitly prescribed in the Qur’an or Hadith. Furthermore, the study finds that sanctions imposed on offenders may be classified according to the consequences arising from the offense, namely taʿzir, qisās-diyāt, or hudūd, when the crime is accompanied by other offenses that satisfy the legal elements of each respective jarimah. These findings demonstrate the flexibility of Islamic criminal law in responding to the development of contemporary forms of crime.
Co-Authors Aldi Bahtiar Azazy, Yusup Deden Najmudin Faizal, Enceng Arif Farhan Mardiansah Muhammad Zulfikri Mustakim Rayhan Maulana Muhamad