Rony Kurniawan Pratama
Universitas Sebelas Maret

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The implementation of Pendidikan Khas Kejogjaan in strengthening secondary school students' character Sutrisna Wibawa; Yatun Romdonah Awaliah; Rony Kurniawan Pratama; Suwarna; Farid Setiawan
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol. 45 No. 2 (2026): Cakrawala Pendidikan (June 2026)
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v45i2.95036

Abstract

This study examines the implementation profile of Pendidikan Khas Kejogjaan (PKJ), a culturally grounded character education programme operating in pilot secondary schools across the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Researchers deliberately frame our inquiry around the implementation level rather than causal effectiveness, since the cross-sectional design researchers used cannot establish that students' character changed because of PKJ. Data were gathered from 150 senior and vocational high school students selected from twelve pilot schools through multistage sampling, combining purposive selection of schools with proportional random selection of students. A 102-item questionnaire (Cronbach's α = 0.93) was used to measure three implementation dimensions: philosophy, cultural values, and cultural atmosphere. Descriptive statistics showed a mean of 4.1361 for the philosophical dimension, 4.0433 at the cultural-values dimension, and 3.9289 at the atmosphere dimension. Pearson correlation analysis revealed strong and significant correlations among the three dimensions (r = 0.716 to 0.880, p < 0.01). The lower atmosphere score, paired with the higher score for cognitive culture (4.1133) than for behavioural (3.8467) and material cultures (3.8271), suggests that PKJ is currently more prominent in symbols and signage than in everyday habituation and material environments. Researchers argue that the trilogy of hamemayu hayuning bawana, sangkan paraning dumadi, and manunggaling kawula Gusti has been internalised at the level of recognition; however, the gap between symbol and practice remains a critical area for further policy work. The study provides a baseline framework of PKJ implementation upon which future longitudinal and comparative designs can build.
Ethics, Power, Code: Divergent Bibliometric Trajectories of OpenAI and DeepSeek in the Silicon Valley-Shenzhen AI Race Rony Kurniawan Pratama
Jurnal Media dan Komunikasi Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Media dan Komunikasi (MEDKOM) No 2 Volume 6 2026
Publisher : Airlangga University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/medkom.v6i2.85022

Abstract

This study elucidates the opposing bibliometric trajectories of OpenAI and DeepSeek during the Silicon Valley-Shenzhen AI race by exploring how ethics, power, and geopolitical narratives shape the global AI discourse. Based on 126 English language publications in Scopus (2015–2024) and guided by the PRISMA systematic review methods and VOSviewer science mapping, our study identifies a surge of scholarly outputs after 2021, fuelled by ChatGPT's emergence and China's advancing AI sovereignty agenda. The findings show sharp distinctions in knowledge production: OpenAI-related studies mainly involve Western academic institutions in ethical debates on existential risks and the ethical safeguards needed, while DeepSeek-related studies champion practical implementation in collaboration with Chinese tech conglomerates and state-affiliated universities. Geopolitical framings position OpenAI as an embodiment of Silicon Valley's "democratic innovation" paradigm juxtaposed with DeepSeek as a symbol of China's techno-nationalist strategy. These emerging discursive trends increasingly gravitate toward algorithmic hegemony and governance fragmentation, suggesting that 68% of the comparative US-China studies frame AI development in competitive binaries. These trajectories show how knowledge ecosystems reflect and reinforce competing visions of digital power, from citation networks and institutional affiliations as proxies for ideological struggles.