Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
I Komang Agus Tri Wismantara
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Prosedur Hukum Acara Perdata Terkait Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah: (Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat) Violla Evarista; Kristanto Kristanto; Vinanda Langgeng Kencana; Riyan Ardiansyah; I Komang Agus Tri Wismantara
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Juni: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v3i1.85

Abstract

Land rights disputes arising from overlapping land certificates remain a complex agrarian law issue frequently encountered in Indonesia. This phenomenon reflects weaknesses in the land administration system, particularly in data collection, land measurement, and certificate issuance. Such disputes create conflicts, legal uncertainty, and reduced public trust in the land registration system. In practice, these disputes are generally resolved through civil litigation procedures in the District Court. This study aims to comprehensively analyze civil procedural law in resolving land rights disputes involving overlapping certificates and to examine the evidentiary strength of land certificates in judicial proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by primary and secondary legal materials. The findings indicate that dispute resolution begins with the filing of a lawsuit, followed by mediation, court examination, and the evidentiary process as the most crucial stage in determining lawful ownership. Land certificates serve as strong evidence; however, they are not absolute, as they may be challenged if administrative or substantive legal defects are identified. Judges play a central role in assessing certificate validity by considering land history, physical possession, good faith, and compliance with legal procedures. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of dispute resolution still requires improvement through better land administration, enhanced data accuracy, and stronger institutional integration.
Studi Yuridis Tentang Kewenangan Dokter Anestesi dalam Penetapan Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) pada Operasi Risiko Tinggi I Komang Agus Tri Wismantara; Aris Prio Agus Santoso; Rina Arum Prastyanti
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3136

Abstract

Bioethical and legal dilemmas arise when a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) status is applied within the context of high-risk surgery, where anesthesia inherently depresses vital functions in a manner mimicking cardiac arrest. This study aims to analyze the juridical basis of the anesthesiologist's authority in determining or suspending DNR status in the operating room, as well as its legal implications for medical liability and patient autonomy. This study employs a normative juridical research method utilizing a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Secondary data sources are derived from legislation regarding medical practice, health laws, and medical ethics literature. The findings indicate that the anesthesiologist's authority regarding DNR in high-risk surgeries is not absolute but is contingent upon the principle of required reconsideration. Juridically, anesthesiologists possess discretionary authority to perform limited resuscitation if cardiac arrest is induced by the anesthetic procedure (iatrogenic) rather than the natural progression of a terminal illness, to prevent malpractice and wrongful death claims. However, the absence of specific regulations governing "Intraoperative DNR" in Indonesia creates a legal vacuum that may lead to medical disputes. Consequently, explicit regulations regarding perioperative DNR re-evaluation protocols are necessary to ensure legal certainty for medical practitioners while upholding patient rights.
Co-Authors Aris Prio Agus Santoso Kristanto Kristanto Rina Arum Prastyanti Riyan Ardiansyah Vinanda Langgeng Kencana Violla Evarista