Ema Hidayanti
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementasi Nilai Moderasi Beragama pada Tradisi Satu Tungku Tiga Batu dalam Konseling Keluarga Islam Mita Putri Apriliani; Ema Hidayanti; Abdul Karim; Widayat Mintarsih
Journal of Society Counseling Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Society Counseling
Publisher : Scidacplus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59388/josc.v4i1.863

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of religious moderation values in Islamic family counseling practices rooted in the local wisdom of Satu Tungku Tiga Batu in Kampung Patipi Pulau, Fakfak Regency. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, with data collected through field observations, in-depth interviews with a religious leader (Jufri) and a traditional as well as government figure (Sudin Bauw), documentation of community social practices, and content analysis of a BBC News video highlighting interfaith coexistence in Fakfak. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis with predetermined coding categories, namely justice, balance, and tolerance. The findings indicate that the value of justice is implemented through deliberative counseling practices that provide equal participation opportunities for all family members, regardless of religious background or clan affiliation. Balance is reflected in the proportional distribution of family roles and emotional regulation within family relationships. Meanwhile, tolerance is manifested through acceptance of religious differences and the maintenance of kinship ties across faiths. These practices are strengthened by the integration of Islamic values and the philosophy of Satu Tungku Tiga Batu, which functions as an ethical and cultural framework in family guidance. This study concludes that Islamic family counseling in Kampung Patipi Pulau operates contextually through cultural mediation and contributes to the development of culturally grounded religious moderation.
Negotiating Islamic Values and Human Rights: Community Responses to Same-Sex Marriage Legalization among Patani Muslims in Southern Thailand Sureeyana Masae; Raharjo; Ema Hidayanti
JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): December
Publisher : Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62159/jpi.v5i3.2876

Abstract

This study examines how Muslim actors in the Patani region of Southern Thailand negotiate Islamic values and human rights principles in responding to the legalization of same-sex marriage. Using an interpretivist qualitative multiple-case study design, the research involved seven purposively selected informants across Yala, Pattani, and Narathiwat, comprising three heads of Islamic religious councils, two students, one teacher, and one community activist. Data were generated through in-depth unstructured interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis, and were analyzed through iterative coding, thematic categorization, cross-case comparison, and interpretive synthesis, with credibility strengthened through source and methodological triangulation. The findings indicate a pattern of normative negotiation rather than a simple acceptance-rejection dichotomy. Participants generally maintained the Islamic normative position that same-sex marriage is not religiously valid, while distinguishing this theological judgment from the civic treatment of individuals. They simultaneously emphasized human dignity, security, legal protection, freedom from violence, and peaceful coexistence, while recognizing the state’s authority to regulate civil law. Responses were shaped by religious education, ulama authority, Patani Malay cultural identity, educational background, and exposure to digital and transnational human-rights discourse. The study contributes the concept of normative religious non-acceptance with civic accommodation to explain how religious commitment and minority citizenship may coexist without requiring normative homogenization.