Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Delegation of Authority From The General Court to the Shariah Court in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province Alsyam; Yandriza; Zulkifli
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/mc5q7e03

Abstract

Law enforcement carried out by the Aceh Syar'iyah Court cannot be separated from the bureaucracy which is one of the vehicles in the implementation of judicial power. Bureaucracy is a determining factor in the success of the entire program agenda including in the framework of realizing a clean and free judicial apparatus from KKN so that the bureaucrats in the Aceh Syar'iyah Court can realize good governance (good governance). The Aceh Syar'iyah Court in carrying out all activities related to the interests of the Appellate Court, both administrative, financial and organizational in nature, is obliged to be accountable for the implementation of its duties, functions and roles in the management of resources, and sources of funds and authorities entrusted to the public referring to the Decree of the Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: MA / SEK / 07 / SK / III / 2006 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of the Secretariat of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia as one of the state / government institutions in accordance with the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly Number: XI / MPR / 1998 concerning the Implementation of a Clean and Corruption-Free State, Collusion and Nepotism and Presidential Instruction Number: 7 of 1999 concerning Accountability of Government Agency Performance. The legal research method is a systematic way of conducting research. Normative legal research uses normative case studies in the form of legal behavior products, for example reviewing laws. The results of this study explain that first, the Syar'iyah Court only carry out its functions within the scope of the authority of the Religious Court in the field of marriage, inheritance, will, grant, waqaf, zakat, infaq, sadaqah and sharia economy, whereas criminal matters are only limited to matters alcohol(liquor), solitude (pervert),gambling(gambling). Second, the authority of the Sharia Court is no longer limited to certain civil matters, but also covers the fields of mu'amalah and jinayah. However, in fact, the laws and regulations concerning the duties of the Sharia Court are still incomplete and thisThis is one of the problems faced. While Law Number 48 of 2009 no longer explains about the Syar'iyah Court until the position and the authority of the Sharia Court in Aceh becomes unclear
Inkonstitusionalitas Bersyarat Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1980 dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 191/PUU-XXIII/2025 tentang Hak Keuangan Pejabat Negara Yunita Syofyan; Alsyam
Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/266d2841

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 191/PUU-XXIII/2025 menandai adanya perubahan penting dalam pengaturan hak keuangan pejabat negara, khususnya terkait keberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1980 tentang Hak Keuangan/Administratif Pimpinan dan Anggota Lembaga Tertinggi/Tinggi Negara serta Bekas Pimpinan Lembaga Tertinggi/Tinggi Negara dan Bekas Anggota Lembaga Tinggi Negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menyatakan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1980 inkonstitusional bersyarat serta mengkaji implikasi yuridis putusan tersebut terhadap keberlakuan undang-undang dan pembentukan regulasi baru mengenai hak keuangan pejabat negara. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual, yang didukung oleh studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi menilai Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1980 tidak lagi sesuai dengan perkembangan sistem ketatanegaraan pasca amandemen UUD NRI Tahun 1945, sehingga diperlukan pembaruan melalui mekanisme legislasi. Model putusan inkonstitusional bersyarat dipilih untuk menghindari kekosongan hukum sekaligus memberikan kesempatan kepada pembentuk undang-undang untuk menyusun regulasi baru yang lebih proporsional, berkeadilan, akuntabel, dan sesuai dengan prinsip konstitusional. Dengan demikian, putusan a quo tidak hanya memiliki implikasi terhadap keberlakuan norma yang diuji, tetapi juga menjadi landasan penting bagi pembaruan hukum mengenai pengaturan hak keuangan pejabat negara di Indonesia.