Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Islam Nusantara Al-Irfan: Journal Of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies
M. Syihabul Ihsan Al Haqiqy
Universitas Sunan Gresik
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
An Error Analysis of Imla’iyyah in Arabic Speech Text Writing: A Case Study from an Inter-School Competition Putra Hardiansyah; M. Syihabul Ihsan Al Haqiqy; Ngantori Ngantori; Asbarin Asbarin; Nur Halifah
JURNAL ISLAM NUSANTARA Vol 9, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Ta'lif wa An-Nasyr (LTN) PBNU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33852/jurnalnu.v9i2.583

Abstract

Errors in writing speech texts reflect a lack of understanding of IMLA rules and can affect the quality of the delivered speech. This study aims to describe the types of imla’iyyah errors and evaluate their occurrence in the writing of Arabic speech texts at PORSENI (Sports and Arts Week) at KKMT 01 Gresik in 2025. This research employs a qualitative method with an analytical study type through the imla’ approach. Documentation was used as the data collection method, with 31 speech texts obtained from Google Drive serving as the primary data source. The data analysis technique follows Corder’s theory, which includes collecting error data, identifying and classifying errors, and explaining and evaluating them. The results of this study are: (1) errors in writing hamzah washal and qatha’ occurred 32 times (52%), errors in the addition of the letter “al” were found 15 times (24%), errors in writing mad occurred 6 times (9%), errors in adding and omitting letters were found 5 times (8%), letter substitution errors occurred once (2%), and letter connection errors occurred 3 times (5%). (2) The suggested evaluation includes improving understanding of imla’ rules, increasing practice in writing and spelling words correctly, comprehending and applying mad writing rules properly, and enhancing typing skills.
Transforming the Teaching of Arabic Writing Skills through the Think Pair Share Strategy Rahmah Fadhilah Agustina; M. Syihabul Ihsan Al Haqiqy
Al-Irfan : Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/al-irfan.v8i2.493

Abstract

riting instruction in Arabic often faces various challenges, such as low student motivation, limited vocabulary, and a lack of ability to develop ideas in written form. These conditions make the learning process less effective and result in suboptimal student writing performance. Therefore, it is necessary to apply a cooperative learning strategy such as Think-Pair-Share as an alternative to enhance students’ participation and writing skills through collaboration. The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of the Think-Pair-Share strategy in teaching maharah al-kitābah (writing skills). The subjects of this study were eighth grade students of State Islamic Junior High School of Batu. Data collection techniques included observation, unstructured interviews with ten students, and documentation related to the main Arabic textbook. The data analysis technique employed the flow model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana, which consists of data condensation, data display, and verification. The results of the study show that the use of the Think-Pair-Share strategy in maharah al-kitābah consists of five steps: (1) Introduction, the teacher divides students into several groups; (2) Think, students answer questions individually and write them on worksheets; (3) Pair, students discuss their answers in groups and write the best group answer on the worksheet; (4) Share, students present the group’s work on the board, which is then commented on by other groups; and (5) Closing, the teacher provides feedback by clarifying, correcting, and concluding the correct answers from each group’s discussion. Thus, the use of this strategy not only emphasizes the collaborative aspect but also integrates critical thinking and individual reflection processes before writing.
Co-Authors Asbarin Ngantori Ngantori Nur Halifah Putra Hardiansyah Rahmah Fadhilah Agustina