Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peran Nadzir Dalam Pengelolaan Aset Wakaf Di Kua Sangatta Utara Rita Mulyani; Hartono; Siti Munfiatik
Nusantara Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 3 No. 11 (2026): NJMS - Juni 2026
Publisher : PT. Inovasi Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Wakaf sebagai instrumen filantropi Islam memiliki potensi besar dalam mendukung kesejahteraan umat, namun efektivitasnya sangat bergantung pada kapasitas nadzir selaku pengelola. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran nadzir dalam pengelolaan aset wakaf serta mengevaluasi pemenuhannya terhadap kualifikasi yang dipersyaratkan Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 di KUA Sangatta Utara. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan field research, melalui teknik pengumpulan data berupa observasi, wawancara terstruktur, dan dokumentasi. Analisis data mengacu pada model interaktif Miles dan Huberman dengan pengujian keabsahan melalui triangulasi sumber, teknik, dan waktu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tiga dari empat tugas nadzir berdasarkan Pasal 11 telah terpenuhi, meliputi pengadministrasian, pengelolaan, serta pengawasan aset wakaf. Adapun kewajiban pelaporan kepada Badan Wakaf Indonesia belum terlaksana akibat belum optimalnya pendataan BWI di wilayah Kutai Timur. Seluruh nadzir juga telah memenuhi kualifikasi Pasal 10. Diperlukan akselerasi pendataan BWI dan penguatan kapasitas nadzir melalui bimbingan teknis yang terstruktur
ASAS BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD SEBAGAI PARAMETER UTAMA HAK ASUH DI PENGADILAN AGAMA (ANALISIS NORMATIF DAN YURISPUDENSI) Muchammad Abdul Basir; Zanuar Anwari; Hartono
Al-Usroh : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 3 No. 02 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Islamic Family Law, STAI Sangatta Kutai Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55799/alusroh.v3i02.843

Abstract

The application of the Best Interest of the Child principle in custody determinations is a critical issue, as it directly affects children’s welfare and the quality of legal protection in family disputes. Variations in judicial practices and inconsistencies between legal norms and judicial considerations indicate the need for a more in-depth examination of the principle’s effectiveness. This paper aims to evaluate the consistency of the application of the best interests principle in the Religious Courts through a normative–empirical approach, while also identifying gaps between regulatory frameworks, judicial practices, and the actual conditions experienced by children following custody decisions. This study employs a qualitative method, including normative analysis of child protection regulations, a jurisprudential review of court decisions, limited interviews, and an examination of empirical data concerning children’s conditions. The findings reveal that although the best interests principle serves as a strong legal foundation, its implementation remains influenced by the absence of objective assessment standards, variations in judicial reasoning, and the limited involvement of professional assessors. The study further confirms that custody decisions prioritizing children’s needs have a positive impact on their physical, emotional, and social development. Therefore, the formulation of technical guidelines and the involvement of relevant experts are necessary to ensure more consistent and child-centered custody rulings.