Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Jurnal Ius Constituendum ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum
Kurdi Kurdi
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Adhyaksa
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Yuridis Eksistensi Koperasi Sebagai Badan ‎Usaha Soko Guru Perekonomian Indonesia dan Analisis ‎Kritis Kapasitas Legal Standing Anggota dalam ‎Gugatan Pembubaran Kurdi Kurdi; Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan; Abd Kadir; Muhammad Iqdam Haqkiki; Khairul Umam Ganda Nusantara
ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2026): ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Mei
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/arbiter.v8i1.6975

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the juridical understanding of cooperatives as pillars of the Indonesian economy amid regulatory dynamics and to analyze procedural obstacles in member-dispute litigation against the state critically. The research method used is normative jurisprudence, with a statutory approach and a case approach. The results show that the legal aspects of Indonesian cooperatives are undergoing a crucial transition, returning substantively to the family-based regime of Law Number 25 of 1992 following the annulment of Law Number 17 of 2012, while administratively transforming digitally through the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 13 of 2025 concerning Cooperative Legalization. This study also found that, in the case study of ‎the Ponorogo District Court Decision Number 19/PDT.G/2024/PN/PNG, the failure of cooperative members to claim damages was caused by formal defects in applying the Persona Standi in Judicio doctrine and non-compliance with Class Action requirements. The conclusion emphasizes that legal protection for cooperative members requires integrating an understanding of cooperative identity, digital administrative compliance, and appropriate litigation strategies, while reaffirming the limits of state liability, which does not automatically serve as a guarantor of dissolved cooperative debts.‎
Dekonstruksi Asas Contrarius Actus Atas Tindakan Faktual (Feitelijke Handelingen) Pejabat Tun dalam Rezim Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan Kurdi Kurdi; Maydika Ramadani; Teuku Ahmad Dadek
Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): September
Publisher : IAI Darussalam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan (UUAP) memperluas objek pengawasan peradilan melampaui beschikking tradisional hingga mencakup Tindakan Faktual (feitelijke handelingen). Artikel ini mengkaji rasio legis dan reposisi Asas Contrarius Actus terhadap Tindakan Faktual, serta implikasi yuridis perluasan kompetensi absolut PTUN atas penghentiannya. Melalui metode yuridis normatif, ditemukan bahwa penerapan asas ini pada Tindakan Faktual menghasilkan tegangan normatif karena sifat irreversible tindakan tersebut tidak dapat direspons sekadar dengan skema pencabutan formal-retroaktif. Selain itu, kompetensi absolut PTUN (Pasal 87 UUAP) memunculkan ambiguitas struktural saat berhadapan dengan Tindakan Faktual yang telah selesai, sehingga membutuhkan rekonstruksi remedial yang berorientasi pada penghentian dan pemulihan, bukan sekadar pembatalan.
Potential Violations of the Right to a Good and Healthy Environment: The Impact of Granting Special Mining Permits on Religious Community Organizations Kurdi Kurdi; Joko Cahyono; Cut Zulfahnur Syafitri
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JUNE
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v10i2.11847

Abstract

This study aims to critically examine the potential violations of the constitutional right to a good and healthy environment arising from the government’s policy of granting Special Mining Business Permit Areas (WIUPK) to religious community organizations. The urgency of this research is based on concerns that these organizations, lacking adequate technical competence, may exacerbate environmental degradation, perpetuate violations left by previous permit holders, hinder the transition to renewable energy, and obstruct access to justice for victims of environmental harm. Using a normative juridical method with legislative and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes the policy from the perspective of environmental human rights, a focus absent in prior research. The findings reveal that the policy has a strong potential to violate the right to a good and healthy environment and contradicts the state’s obligation to protect human rights as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. The novelty of this research lies in its emphasis on the conflict of interest between the traditional role of religious organizations as community advocates and their new role as mining operators. Therefore, it is recommended that the government review and revoke the priority granting scheme for WIUPK and consider alternative participation models for religious organizations through non-operational mechanisms such as community development funds or minority non-controlling share ownership.
Co-Authors Abd Kadir Cut Zulfahnur Syafitri Joko Cahyono Khairul Umam Ganda Nusantara Maydika Ramadani Muhammad Iqdam Haqkiki Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan Teuku Ahmad Dadek