Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Priviet Social Sciences Journal Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
Febryan Hidayat
STAI Jajar Islamic Center
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Consumer protection in paid crypto training services analysis is based on positive law and Islamic law Febryan Hidayat; Muttorik Alil Abasir
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1334

Abstract

The rapid growth of cryptocurrency investment in Indonesia has encouraged the emergence of paid crypto-training services offering investment education and trading guidance. However, concerns arise regarding misleading promotions, inadequate risk disclosure, and the promotion of speculative trading practices that may harm consumers. While previous studies have focused on cryptocurrency regulation and investor protection, limited attention has been given to consumer protection in paid crypto training services from the perspectives of Indonesian positive law and Islamic law. This study aims to analyze consumer protection issues in such services and develop an integrated consumer protection framework. Using normative legal research with statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study examines relevant Indonesian laws and Islamic legal principles. The findings show that misleading advertising, insufficient risk disclosure, and speculative trading signals are the main consumer protection concerns. Both legal systems emphasize transparency, truthful information, accountability, and the prevention of harm. The main contribution of this study is an integrated consumer protection framework consisting of five pillars: transparency, accurate information, risk disclosure, accountability, and prevention of harm. The framework contributes to strengthening consumer protection in digital financial education services.
Urbanization and Structural Transformation of Local Communities in Southeast Asia Febryan Hidayat; Agus Kusman; Deo Renaldi Saputra; Cahyadi Nugroho
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): :February: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studie
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/6qepww57

Abstract

This study synthesizes interdisciplinary scholarship to explain how urbanization and structural transformation reconfigure local communities in Southeast Asia through multi-scalar institutional, spatial, and sustainability dynamics. The analysis demonstrates that economic restructuring, migration, and mega-urban expansion operate as interdependent processes that reshape governance arrangements, inequality patterns, and community agency. Institutional mediation emerges as a critical mechanism translating macro transformation into differentiated social outcomes, while community practices actively renegotiate access to resources and representation. Sustainability transitions further embed ecological constraints within urban development, positioning resilience as a co-produced achievement of governance innovation and collective adaptation. By integrating structural, socio-spatial, and institutional perspectives, the study advances a unified framework that conceptualizes communities as active nodes within evolving urban systems. This framework clarifies how inequality, environmental risk, and governance fragmentation interact across scales, generating adaptive pathways rather than linear outcomes. The findings contribute to urban theory by foregrounding community agency in structural change and offer analytically grounded insights for policy approaches that align economic transformation, social inclusion, and ecological resilience in rapidly urbanizing regions.
The Normative Boundaries of Artificial Intelligence Liability in Autonomous Decision-Making: A Doctrinal Analysis of Emerging Legal Principles Febryan Hidayat; Danang Purnomo Jakti; Muttorik Alil Abasir
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) within autonomous decision-making systems has generated profound challenges for traditional legal doctrines of liability, accountability, and responsibility attribution. This study examines the normative boundaries of AI liability through a doctrinal and normative legal research approach based on statutory regulations, international legal instruments, judicial decisions, regulatory frameworks, and contemporary legal scholarship. The analysis focuses on the evolving relationship between legal personhood, fault, foreseeability, risk allocation, and accountability within increasingly autonomous technological environments. The findings demonstrate that existing legal systems continue to reject the attribution of independent legal liability to AI systems despite their growing operational autonomy. Liability remains primarily attached to developers, deployers, operators, data controllers, and institutional actors whose decisions shape the design, governance, and deployment of AI technologies. Contemporary legal developments reveal a gradual shift from exclusively fault-based liability toward hybrid frameworks integrating risk management, preventive obligations, and accountability-based governance. The study concludes that the most coherent doctrinal model is a layered accountability framework in which responsibility is allocated according to governance capacity, control, risk creation, and regulatory obligations, thereby preserving legal certainty while accommodating technological transformation in autonomous decision-making ecosystems.
Co-Authors Agus Kusman Cahyadi Nugroho Danang Purnomo Jakti Deo Renaldi Saputra Muttorik Alil Abasir