Marwan Hayeemaming
Fatoni University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

DIGITAL MORAL DISRUPTION IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES IN THE AI ERA AT BLITAR REGENCY HIGH SCHOOLS: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES IN THE AI ERA AT BLITAR REGENCY HIGH SCHOOLS Miftakhul Rohman; Doni Saputra; Marwan Hayeemaming
Edukasi Islami : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol 15 No 02 (2026): Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/ei.v15i02.10161

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital technology and artificial intelligence has transformed the educational landscape, creating both opportunities and challenges, particularly in moral and character development. Islamic Religious Education (PAI), which aims to foster spiritual awareness and cultivate noble character, is increasingly challenged by digital culture, which is often value-neutral and sometimes misaligned with Islamic ethical principles. This study examines the phenomenon of digital moral disruption in the implementation of PAI learning in public senior high schools in Blitar Regency. This study employs a qualitative case study approach to explore the phenomenon within its real-life context. The participants include PAI teachers, students, school principals, and other relevant stakeholders. Data were collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis. The data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, which consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that digital moral disruption affects students’ attitudes and learning behaviors through excessive smartphone use, increased reliance on digital information, and reduced face-to-face interaction. These factors hinder the effective internalization of Islamic values in the learning process. This study offers important practical implications. Teachers should integrate digital literacy and ethical guidance into PAI instruction while reinforcing their role as moral exemplars. Policymakers should support curriculum development that balances technological competence with character education and provide professional development programs to help teachers address digital challenges effectively. Strengthening digital ethics and promoting responsible technology use are essential to sustain students’ moral development in the digital era.
Decolonizing Religious Authority: A Comparative Typology of Ba‘alawi Religious Authority in Pekalongan Luthfi Maulana; Muhandis Azzuhri; Marwan Hayeemaming; Abdul Basit
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i2.8794

Abstract

Studies on religious authority within the Arab diaspora in Indonesia have primarily focused on genealogical legitimacy, charismatic leadership, or organizational influence, while paying limited attention to how competing forms of religious authority are reconstructed through decolonial processes and socio-religious power relations. Addressing this gap, this study examines how Ba‘alawi religious authority is decolonized and rearticulated in contemporary Indonesia through the perspectives of Habib Rizieq Shihab (Islamic Defenders Front), Habib Luthfi bin Yahya (Nahdlatul Ulama), and Habib Ahmad Baqbarah together with Habib Ahmad Ridho Assegaf (Shi’a). Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach, data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis, and analyzed using decolonial theory in dialogue with Michel Foucault’s concept of power/knowledge. The comparative analysis of empirical data identified three distinct typologies of religious authority. The first is an Islamist model, which reconstructs religious authority through an integrative-formalistic understanding of Islam and the state while simultaneously engaging substantivist interpretations of Islamic political order. The second is a Moderate model, which legitimizes religious authority through nationalist discourse, devotion to the Ahl al-Bayt, and mawlid traditions as mechanisms for cultivating social cohesion and religious legitimacy. The third is an Ukhuwah model, developed within the Shi’a Ba‘alawi network, which reconstructs authority through the ethical teachings of Sayyidina ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib and promotes humanitarian solidarity across religious and social boundaries. These three typologies emerged from a comparative analysis of the actors’ religious narratives, organizational practices, and strategies for negotiating authority within Indonesian Muslim society. The study contributes to the scholarship on decolonial studies by demonstrating that the decolonization of religious authority is not a singular process of resisting inherited colonial structures, but a plural and contested process that generates multiple configurations of religious legitimacy and socio-religious power. It further extends debates on religious authority by proposing a comparative typology of Ba‘alawi authority that explains how competing decolonial projects reshape Islamic authority in contemporary Indonesia.  
Decolonizing Religious Authority: A Comparative Typology of Ba‘alawi Religious Authority in Pekalongan Luthfi Maulana; Muhandis Azzuhri; Marwan Hayeemaming; Abdul Basit
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v37i2.8794

Abstract

Studies on religious authority within the Arab diaspora in Indonesia have primarily focused on genealogical legitimacy, charismatic leadership, or organizational influence, while paying limited attention to how competing forms of religious authority are reconstructed through decolonial processes and socio-religious power relations. Addressing this gap, this study examines how Ba‘alawi religious authority is decolonized and rearticulated in contemporary Indonesia through the perspectives of Habib Rizieq Shihab (Islamic Defenders Front), Habib Luthfi bin Yahya (Nahdlatul Ulama), and Habib Ahmad Baqbarah together with Habib Ahmad Ridho Assegaf (Shi’a). Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach, data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis, and analyzed using decolonial theory in dialogue with Michel Foucault’s concept of power/knowledge. The comparative analysis of empirical data identified three distinct typologies of religious authority. The first is an Islamist model, which reconstructs religious authority through an integrative-formalistic understanding of Islam and the state while simultaneously engaging substantivist interpretations of Islamic political order. The second is a Moderate model, which legitimizes religious authority through nationalist discourse, devotion to the Ahl al-Bayt, and mawlid traditions as mechanisms for cultivating social cohesion and religious legitimacy. The third is an Ukhuwah model, developed within the Shi’a Ba‘alawi network, which reconstructs authority through the ethical teachings of Sayyidina ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib and promotes humanitarian solidarity across religious and social boundaries. These three typologies emerged from a comparative analysis of the actors’ religious narratives, organizational practices, and strategies for negotiating authority within Indonesian Muslim society. The study contributes to the scholarship on decolonial studies by demonstrating that the decolonization of religious authority is not a singular process of resisting inherited colonial structures, but a plural and contested process that generates multiple configurations of religious legitimacy and socio-religious power. It further extends debates on religious authority by proposing a comparative typology of Ba‘alawi authority that explains how competing decolonial projects reshape Islamic authority in contemporary Indonesia.