Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pendekatan-Pendekatan dalam Ilmu Politik Umu Habibah; Maulidya Winatasya; Novia Ayu Dara; Meinajwa Akbar; Surya Sukti
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI 2026
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/kxxk2n57

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas epistemologi dan pendekatan keilmuan dalam ilmu politik serta perkembangan pendekatan tradisional, modern, dan konvergensi dalam studi politik kontemporer. Epistemologi dipahami sebagai cabang filsafat yang mengkaji hakikat, sumber, metode, dan kriteria kebenaran pengetahuan. Dalam konteks ilmu politik, epistemologi menempatkan politik sebagai ilmu yang sistematis, rasional, metodologis, dan dapat diuji secara empiris. Pendekatan tradisional dalam ilmu politik menekankan aspek legal-formal dan institusional, sedangkan pendekatan modern mengedepankan analisis empiris, perilaku politik, dan sistem politik secara menyeluruh. Dengan demikian, perkembangan pendekatan dalam ilmu politik menunjukkan transformasi dari kajian normatifinstitusional menuju analisis empiris dan global yang lebih kompleks.  
Fiqh Syiah Syiah: Sejarah Awal, Perkembangan, dan Adaptasi dalam Modern Era Maulidya Winatasya; Meinajwa Akbar; Sinar Kumala; Alencia Muryanti; Surya Sukti
Jurnal Teologi Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JUNI-NOVEMBER
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/34y69j65

Abstract

This article examines the development of Shi‘i political jurisprudence (fiqh siyasah) from its early emergence to its transformation in the modern era. The study highlights the historical roots of Shi‘i political thought, particularly its foundation in the doctrine of the Imamate, which distinguishes it from Sunni political theory. Using a qualitative literature-based approach, this research explores the evolution of Shi‘i political thought across the classical, medieval, and modern periods.The findings indicate that Shi‘i political jurisprudence has undergone significant transformation, particularly through the formulation of the doctrine of wilayat al-faqih, which integrates religious authority with modern state governance. Furthermore, this article compares Shi‘i and Sunni political jurisprudence, emphasizing differences in leadership legitimacy, authority structures, and adaptability to modern political systems.This study concludes that Shi‘i political jurisprudence demonstrates a dynamic capacity to adapt to contemporary political realities while maintaining its theological foundations.