Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy INLAW
Rizki Ardita
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE DIVISION OF JOINT PROPERTY ON LAND OWNED BY ONE PARTY'S PARENTS ACCORDING TO MARRIAGE LAW (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 183/Pdt.G/2025/MS.Sgi) Rizki Ardita; Beby Sendy; Bambang Fitrianto
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): June
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21525999

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the division of joint assets and the judge's legal considerations in determining the status of joint assets standing on land owned by one of the parties' parents and the suitability of the decision with the provisions of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. The method used in this study is normative law with a case approach, namely analyzing secondary data in the form of the decision of the Mahkamah Syar’iyah Sigli Number 183 / Pdt.G / 2025 / MS.Sgi as well as laws and legal materials related to joint assets. This study shows that in this case, the object of the dispute is a permanent house unit standing on land owned by the Plaintiff's parents which is recognized as joint assets, while the land where the house stands is the Plaintiff's inherited property, but in its consideration the Panel of Judges did not clearly outline the boundaries between joint assets in the form of a house and land as inherited property, but instead immediately decided that the Defendant should divide 2 houses in kind. So that the decision can give rise to double interpretations as if the land where the house stands is also part of the joint assets. This creates legal uncertainty in the implementation of the decision and could potentially harm one of the parties. Therefore, the division of joint assets should be carried out fairly by clearly separating the house as joint property from the land as acquired property, in order to comply with the provisions of the Marriage Law.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE DIVISION OF JOINT PROPERTY ON LAND OWNED BY ONE PARTY'S PARENTS ACCORDING TO MARRIAGE LAW (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 183/Pdt.G/2025/MS.Sgi) Rizki Ardita; Beby Sendy; Bambang Fitrianto
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v3i4.173

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the division of joint assets and the judge's legal considerations in determining the status of joint assets standing on land owned by one of the parties' parents and the suitability of the decision with the provisions of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. The method used in this study is normative law with a case approach, namely analyzing secondary data in the form of the decision of the Mahkamah Syar’iyah Sigli Number 183 / Pdt.G / 2025 / MS.Sgi as well as laws and legal materials related to joint assets. This study shows that in this case, the object of the dispute is a permanent house unit standing on land owned by the Plaintiff's parents which is recognized as joint assets, while the land where the house stands is the Plaintiff's inherited property, but in its consideration the Panel of Judges did not clearly outline the boundaries between joint assets in the form of a house and land as inherited property, but instead immediately decided that the Defendant should divide 2 houses in kind. So that the decision can give rise to double interpretations as if the land where the house stands is also part of the joint assets. This creates legal uncertainty in the implementation of the decision and could potentially harm one of the parties. Therefore, the division of joint assets should be carried out fairly by clearly separating the house as joint property from the land as acquired property, in order to comply with the provisions of the Marriage Law.
Analisis Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang PT. First Anugerah Karya Wisata (First Travel) (Studi Kasus : Putusan 3095K/PID.SUS/2018) Az-Zahrotu Zaahin Harahap; Rizki Ardita; Armilati Suryani Putri Gaja; Bambang Fitrianto
Indonesian Journal of Law Vol. 1 No. 12 (2024): INLAW - Desember 2024
Publisher : PT. INOVASI TEKNOLOGI KOMPUTER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas mengenai kejahatan tindak pidana pencucian uang yang dilakukan PT. First Anugerah Karya Wisata (First Travel) yaitu yang tertuang dalam putusan 3095K/Pid.Sus/2018, sebuah agen perjalanan umrah di Indonesia. Kasus ini melibatkan ribuan korban dengan kerugian finansial yang sangat besar, yang menunjukkan skala besar dari kejahatan kejahatan tindak pidana pencucian uang yang dilakukan PT First Travel dari tahun 2015 sampai dengan 2017. PT First travel melakukan penipuan dengan membuat penawaran paket umrah dengan harga terjangkau, sehingga membuat banyak konsumen yang tertarik dan membeli paket umrah tersebut. Namun sayangnya, perjalanan yang dinanti-nantikan oleh para konsumen tidak kunjung terjadi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis modus operandi kejahatan tindak pidana pencucian uang yang dilakukan oleh pendiri PT First Travel, jenis pelanggaran hukum yang telah dilakukan, dan upaya pencegahan agar kejahatan bisnis khususnya tindak pidana pencucian uang seperti kasus PT First Travel ini dapat diminimalisir kejadiannya di masa depan.
Co-Authors Armilati Suryani Putri Gaja Az-Zahrotu Zaahin Harahap Bambang Fitrianto Beby Sendy