Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy
Jetty E.H. Mokat
Universitas Negeri Manado
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENT POLICIES IN WASTE MANAGEMENT IN BITU NG CITY Senny Enggelina Manansang; Jetty E.H. Mokat; Joyce Ch. Kumaat
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): June
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v4i2.262

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to analyze the implementation of waste management in Bitung City based on Regional Regulation Number 17 of 2013 and identify the factors that influence it. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with the Miles and Huberman interactive analysis model. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation. Informants consisted of officials and staff of the Bitung City Environmental Service, village/district officials, cleaning staff/waste collectors, and the community. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of waste management is not optimal in three main indicators: (1) Waste sorting is still very limited because the community is not used to it, supporting facilities are not available, and the perception is that sorted waste will be mixed again during transportation; (2) Waste collection faces problems with the availability of very limited TPS (landfills), the condition of the TPS does not meet the standards of being closed, neat, and odorless, and the collection mechanism is not systematic; (3) Waste transportation is disrupted because the fleet is often damaged due to lack of routine maintenance, reactive (emergency) maintenance, uneven schedules and routes, and the absence of a special fleet for sorted waste so that sorted waste is mixed again. Factors that influence implementation include internal bureaucratic factors (limited personnel, poor fleet maintenance, weak coordination), social and cultural factors (habits of littering, sorting not yet a culture, weak social sanctions), as well as policy and institutional factors (weak enforcement of sanctions, no special institutions at the sub-district level, budget limitations).
THE DPRD'S SUPERVISORY FUNCTION IN MANAGING THE REGIONAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE BUDGET (APBD) IN MIMIKA REGENCY Qoenchy Way Numbery; Evi E. Masengi; Jetty E.H. Mokat
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21158146

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the implementation of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) oversight function on the management of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) in Mimika Regency and identify factors that influence the effectiveness of the implementation of the oversight function. The research method used is qualitative research with a descriptive approach. Research data were obtained through interviews, observations, and documentation. Research informants were selected using a purposive sampling technique consisting of DPRD leaders, commission leaders, and members of the Mimika Regency DPRD involved in the APBD oversight process. Data analysis was carried out through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, as well as drawing conclusions and verification. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the Mimika Regency DPRD's oversight function on APBD management has been carried out at the planning, implementation, and accountability stages of the budget. However, the effectiveness of oversight has not been optimal. At the planning stage, political interests still dominate in the discussion and determination of budget priorities. At the implementation stage, oversight faces various obstacles such as limited human resource competency, lack of supporting data, and technical and administrative obstacles. Meanwhile, at the accountability stage, discussion of financial reports and follow-up of recommendations from oversight results have not been carried out optimally. Supporting factors for the implementation of the oversight function include a clear legal basis, an adequate DPRD institutional structure, and regulatory support for regional financial management. Inhibiting factors include limited human resource capacity, political interference, low information transparency, and limited facilities and infrastructure to support oversight.
Co-Authors Evi E. Masengi Joyce Ch. Kumaat Qoenchy Way Numbery Senny Enggelina Manansang