Hendrawan, Datu
Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Alienasi Pekerja Pada Masyarakat Kapitalis Menurut Karl Marx Datu Hendrawan
Arete Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (196.627 KB)

Abstract

Marx and Marxism are often identified with evil movements that threaten the safety of mankind. Yet when examined, the point depart from Marx’s thinking also comes from humanitarian problems. Karl Marx formulated the basis of his humanity through a quite unique way. Karl Marx does not justify what is humanity (universal), but he reveals the phenomenon of degeneration of humanity through the concept of work alienation. Karl Marx’s struggle with the idea of alienation while in France. The concept of alienation was formulated by Marx in his encounter with Engels’s idea of the suffering of workers in Europe. The concept of alienation is the basis for the theory of class struggle to be formulated later. The awareness of human oppression which is demonstrated through its alienation produces a theory that has the purpose of praxis. Awareness of oppressive circumstances is expected to drive changes to the political and economic system. Work to make workers experience alienation. In a working condition, a worker is actually alienated from his production. When alienated from the production of a worker also do a job that is foreign and not in accordance with the purpose of life. Furthermore, the working conditions to make humans alienated from humanity, because work is no longer an autonomous self-disclosure but only aims to meet the needs of life (animal). The state of the alien world of work makes the workers alienated from the social world. Other workers are foreigners who are placed as opposed to the outsourced workers. Work also makes people alienated from themselves, because the body does not do something that suits the mind.
DEMOKRASI DAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK: MENGKRITISI POPULISME Datu Hendrawan
Arete Vol 8, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33508/arete.v8i2.4015

Abstract

Democracyisbasicallyasystemthatplacesthepeople(demos)asthesu-preme ruler as well as the main power in government. This paper intends to crit-icize the phenomenon of populism that occurs in democracy. The right populismmovement poses a threat to a democratic rule of law because of its power to sup-pressparliaments,dictatethegovernment,intimidatethecourtsandthepolice.In discourse theory and deliberative democracy, Habermas suggests maximizingpublic use of reason as a basis for determining public policy.The communicative ratio that is distinguished from the strategic ratio should be the spirit that underliesthe determination of public policy in a democratic rule of law. In communicative action the intention to be achieved is an intersubjective understanding.Meanwhile, populist movements carry out strategic communication which is often manipulative.
Subjek Pasca Pandemi Covid-19 dalam Perspektif Filsafat Politik Michel Foucault Untara Simon; Datu Hendrawan; Antonius Yuniarto
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 32, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.69153

Abstract

Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk menunjukkan bahwa pada masa pandemi covid 19, berbagai upaya yang dilakukan setiap organisasi sosial untuk menjaga keselamatan warganya menghasilkan berbagai strategi kuasa yang mengatur tindakan individu. Bagi setiap individu, proses politik ini menempatkan kebebasan dalam risiko. Dengan alasan demi keselamatan bersama, tiap orang dikondisikan untuk tidak menjadi subjek yang bereksistensi dan mengejar tujuannya sendiri. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini ingin menjawab pertanyaan dasar soal bagaimana strategi kuasa dijalankan dan mengarahkan tindakan individu pada masa pandemi dan bagaimana individu bisa menjadi subjek yang menentukan diri dan subjektivitasnya. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah meta-analisis dan hermeneutika dengan menggunakan kerangka teori filsafat politik Michel Foucault. Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti menemukan bahwa dalam masa pandemi covid-19 ini, strategi kuasa terhadap individu dilakukan untuk mencapai tujuan politik komunitas/masyarakat yang dianggap lebih penting daripada tujuan pribadi individual. Situasi ini menantang eksistensi subjektivitas. Meski demikian, belajar dari Foucault, peneliti menemukan bahwa eksistensi subjek tetap bisa dibentuk sekalipun individu berada dalam situasi kontrol politis. Pembentukan subjek ini terjadi jika seseorang mampu menentukan tujuan hidup yang ingin dicapai, memahami hal-hal mendasar dalam hidupnya yang harus diubah untuk mencapai tujuan hidup, menentukan bagaimana ia berelasi dengan hal-hal mendasar serta mampu mempraktekkan teknik atau strategi konkret.
Elemen-Elemen Demokrasi dalam Pemikiran Jürgen Habermas: Elements of Democracy in Jurgen Habermas' Thought Hendrawan, Datu; Adinda S., Anastasia Jessica
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jfi.v8i2.91412

Abstract

The decline in the democracy index in Indonesia and the symptoms of weakening democracy throughout the world are urgent matters to respond to. In 2024, Indonesia is categorized as a country that is included in the category of flawed democracy based on a survey by The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). Based on the Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy (LIED), out of 199 countries, only 40% have a democratic system with guaranteed voting rights and freedom of assembly and opinion. This situation needs to be analyzed. An understanding of democracy and its underlying elements is required to analyze the issue. A philosophical approach is needed to formulate the basic elements of democracy. These elements can be used to analyze and examine the problem of the crisis of democracy. A philosopher who has quite comprehensive thoughts on democracy is Jurgen Habermas. In this study, the researcher intends to examine the basic elements of democracy according to Habermas’s ideas and find their relevance in dealing with the current crisis of democracy. This study uses a literature study method, which focuses on interpretation and analysis of texts. Jurgen Habermas's thinking can provide a comprehensive picture of the fundamental elements of democracy. These elements are the existence of public sphere, civil society, communicative action, synergistic links between the system and the life world, public discourse, and the decision-making process through rational deliberation. The completeness of these elements will further strengthen the building of democracy. Reconstruction of democracy can be done by re-examining the completeness and integrity of the conditions of these elements to be improved.