Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arete Jurnal Filsafat Jurnal Filsafat Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Sophia Dharma: Jurnal Filsafat Agama Hindu dan Masyarakat
Anastasia Jessica Adinda S., Anastasia Jessica
UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
AKAR BANALITAS INTELEKTUAL (SUATU KAJIAN FILSAFAT ILMU) Adinda S., Anastasia Jessica
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 23, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (510.319 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.13219

Abstract

This research starts from the problems of education in Indonesia in which Heru Nugroho call them “intellectual banality”. The intellectual banality is a situation which is characterized by unconscious superficiality of thought, and degradation of intellectual and academic quality. Basic idea of this research is to look for roots of the intellectual banality at the level of philosophy of science because educational practices presuppose a perspective to science. Roots of the intellectual banality in this research are: first, there is a priority of quantitative perspective to measure intellectual quality. Prioritization of the quantitative perspective can be viewed as a romanticism of induction method triumph;.second, ignorance the aim of science which is create the humanitarian welfare in general, not only one or a small group of person.
Banalitas Intelektual Dalam Dunia Pendidikan Perguruan Tinggi Suatu Kajian Filsafat Ilmu Anastasia Jessica Adinda S.
Arete Vol 2, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (249.056 KB)

Abstract

This paper discusses the educational problem in Indonesian higher education, which is called by Heru Nugraha as intellectual banality. Intellectual banality is a situation which is marked by unconscious superficiality of thinking and degradation of intellectual and academic quality. This paper aims to find out the causes of intellectual banality from the lens of the philosophy of science. We took this perspective since the educational practices carry out the assumption of how to view the science. Intellectual banality firstly happens due to the view which tends to put more emphasis on the quantity to measure the intellectual quality. This is viewed as the romanticism of inductive methods. The second cause is the neglection of the objective of science to reach the prosperity of all human beings, not only for some communities. Therefore, the changing views on how to measure the quality of education qualitatively need conducting to improve the higher education
Epistemologi Pragmatisme Anastasia Jessica Adinda
Arete Vol 7, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (271.64 KB)

Abstract

The influence of Pragmatism that is so evident in various fields of life makes a review of Pragmatism’s epistemology important. This paper aims to recognize and review the boundaries of Pragmatism’s epistemology. The method used in this study is hermeneutics of the text. The main questions of this study are: “What is the Epistemology of Pragmatism?” And “What is the criticism of the epistemology of Pragmatism?” In order to answer this problem, it will be elaborated respectively: Basic Elements in Epistemology, Analysis of Principles Epistemology in Pragmatism and Critical Evaluation of the Epistemology of Pragmatism.
AKAR BANALITAS INTELEKTUAL (SUATU KAJIAN FILSAFAT ILMU) Anastasia Jessica Adinda S.
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 23, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.13219

Abstract

This research starts from the problems of education in Indonesia in which Heru Nugroho call them “intellectual banality”. The intellectual banality is a situation which is characterized by unconscious superficiality of thought, and degradation of intellectual and academic quality. Basic idea of this research is to look for roots of the intellectual banality at the level of philosophy of science because educational practices presuppose a perspective to science. Roots of the intellectual banality in this research are: first, there is a priority of quantitative perspective to measure intellectual quality. Prioritization of the quantitative perspective can be viewed as a romanticism of induction method triumph;.second, ignorance the aim of science which is create the humanitarian welfare in general, not only one or a small group of person.
MENYINGKAPKAN ASUMSI PRAGMATISME DI BALIK KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK Anastasia Jessica Adinda S
Sophia Dharma: Jurnal Filsafat, Agama Hindu, dan Masyarakat Vol 2 No 2 (2019): SOPHIA DHARMA
Publisher : Program Studi Filsafat Agama Hindu IAHN Gde Pudja Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (594.301 KB)

Abstract

Kesesuaian antara kebijakan publik dengan orientasi untuk mencapai kebaikan umum adalah suatu hal yang perlu senantiasa diupayakan. Hal ini terkait dengan relasi antara pragmatisme dan kebijakan publik itu sendiri. Namun penerapan cara pandang pragmatis tersebut dalam kebijakan publik sering kali terlepas dari kepentingan publik. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dalam bidang filsafat yang berusaha mengkaji asumsi-asumsi pragmatisme dalam kebijakan publik dengan menggunakan perspektif epistemologi pragmatisme awal seperti pemikiran dari Charles Sanders Pierce, William James dan John Dewey. Hasil yang dicapai adalah: (1) pragmatisme dalam bidang ilmu sosial awalnya adalah suatu paham yang mengedepankan penerapan ilmu dalam permasalahan-permaslahaan sosial secara konkret, (2) Penerapan cara pandang pragmatis dalam kebijakan publik lambat laun terlepas dari kepentingan publik terjebak dalam situasi dehumanisasi, (3) konsekuensi logis dari diabsolutkannya konsekuensi praktis dan kegunaan yang mengakibatkan pragmatisme alih-alih membawa pada kebaikan umum, malahan dalam kondisi tersebut manusia menjadi sarana untuk mencapai kepentingan penumpukan modal, atau sarana untuk mencapai kepentingan segelintir golongan
Elemen-Elemen Demokrasi dalam Pemikiran Jürgen Habermas: Elements of Democracy in Jurgen Habermas' Thought Hendrawan, Datu; Adinda S., Anastasia Jessica
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jfi.v8i2.91412

Abstract

The decline in the democracy index in Indonesia and the symptoms of weakening democracy throughout the world are urgent matters to respond to. In 2024, Indonesia is categorized as a country that is included in the category of flawed democracy based on a survey by The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). Based on the Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy (LIED), out of 199 countries, only 40% have a democratic system with guaranteed voting rights and freedom of assembly and opinion. This situation needs to be analyzed. An understanding of democracy and its underlying elements is required to analyze the issue. A philosophical approach is needed to formulate the basic elements of democracy. These elements can be used to analyze and examine the problem of the crisis of democracy. A philosopher who has quite comprehensive thoughts on democracy is Jurgen Habermas. In this study, the researcher intends to examine the basic elements of democracy according to Habermas’s ideas and find their relevance in dealing with the current crisis of democracy. This study uses a literature study method, which focuses on interpretation and analysis of texts. Jurgen Habermas's thinking can provide a comprehensive picture of the fundamental elements of democracy. These elements are the existence of public sphere, civil society, communicative action, synergistic links between the system and the life world, public discourse, and the decision-making process through rational deliberation. The completeness of these elements will further strengthen the building of democracy. Reconstruction of democracy can be done by re-examining the completeness and integrity of the conditions of these elements to be improved.
Co-Authors Hendrawan, Datu