Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Muhadasah : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab
Rizzaldy Satria Wiwaha
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Religion Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Eksplorasi Gaya Bahasa dan Tanda Simbolik 'Bitaqat Hawiyya' Karya Mahmoud Darwish : Studi Stilistika dan Semiotika Maulidya Harahap; Nisa Nur Fitria; Rizzaldy Satria Wiwaha; Dadan Rusmana
Muhadasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Muhadasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Institut Agama Islam Sunan Kalijogo Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51339/muhad.v8i1.4935

Abstract

Puisi ‘Bitaqat Hawiyya’ karya Mahmoud Darwish mencerminkan semangat perlawanan Palestina melalui kekayaan gaya bahasa dan simbolisme mendalam. Penelitian ini mengkaji secara teliti stilistika dan semiotika dalam puisi tersebut, untuk menelusuri bagaimana Darwish membangun identitas nasional lewat karya sastra. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif-analitis, teks puisi sebagai data primer dianalisis dengan teori stilistika Leech & Short (2007) dan semiotika Barthes (1977). Hasil penelitian menyoroti dominasi metafora, repetisi, serta kalimat deklaratif yang secara efektif menegaskan identitas. Kebaruan terletak pada integrasi hibrida stilistika-semiotika: pemetaan deviasi bahasa (metafora, repetisi) melalui stilistika, dilanjutkan interpretasi denotasi-konotasi Barthes, dan sintesis triangulasi yang menguak mitos resistensi Palestina sebagai bentuk perlawanan non-fisik. Implikasi penelitian ini memperkuat pemahaman sastra Arab kontemporer serta dinamika perjuangan identitas, sambil menyumbang pada pengembangan kajian stilistika dan analisis sastra Arab.
Analysis of the Manuscript and Methodology of Imam Syafi'i's Musnad: A Study of the Mujtahid's Monumental Work Devi Ganis Prameswari; Muhammad Albaqir; Rizzaldy Satria Wiwaha; Irwan Abdurrahman; Neni Nurlaela
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i1.2938

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively examine the characteristics and methodology of Musnad Imam Syafi'i, the work of Sheikh Muhammad 'Abid al-Sindi, which compiles the basic hadiths of Imam Syafi'i's legal arguments. This study was conducted to answer the academic need to understand the authenticity, structure, and role of the book in the development of hadith science in the 2nd century Hijriah. This study uses a qualitative, codicological and historical-descriptive approach. Primary data comes from the modern tahqiq edition of Musnad Imam Syafi'i, while secondary data are obtained from classical works such as Tarikh Baghdad (al-Khatib), Siyar A'lam al-Nubala' (al-Dzahabi), and Tahdzib al-Asma' wa al-Lughat (al-Nawawi). Data collection techniques were carried out through documentary studies and text analysis, while data analysis was carried out by analyzing the content of sanad-matan criticism, as well as verification of other works of Imam Syafi'i such as al-Umm. It was found that the Musnad of Imam Shafi'i was compiled based on the companions of the narrators, and focused on the ahadith al-ahkam. The methodology of this book demonstrates a balance between the authenticity of the sanad and legal rationality, emphasizing Imam Shafi'i's role as a link between the early tradition of hadith transmission and the textual and rational Islamic legal system. This study confirms the significance of the Musnad of Imam Shafi'i in the study of hadith and the Shafi'i school of thought, and offers a new approach by combining the study of codicology and hadith criticism to contribute to the study of methodology and the preservation of classical Islamic treasures.
Al-Mustadrak: A Hadith Compilation Both Praised and Criticized Jafar Shodiq; Alfath; Rizzaldy Satria Wiwaha; Engkos Kosasih; Irwan Abdurrahman
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i1.2949

Abstract

Thi s study aims to examine comprehensively Kitāb al-Mustadrak ʿalā al-Ṣaḥīḥayn by al-Ḥākim al-Naysābūrī (d. 405 H), one of the most significant works in the hadith corpus, composed with the purpose of completing authentic traditions that were not included in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. The research seeks to explore the background of the book’s compilation, the author’s scholarly profile, al-Ḥākim’s methodology in collecting and evaluating hadiths, as well as the responses of later scholars concerning the authenticity and quality of the narrations contained within. This study employs a qualitative method using a descriptive-analytical approach through a library-based examination of primary and secondary sources, including al-Mustadrak, Talkhīṣ al-Mustadrak by al-Dhahabī, and critical commentaries from both classical and contemporary hadith scholars. The findings indicate that although al-Ḥākim claimed that all hadiths in al-Mustadrak meet the authenticity criteria applied by al-Bukhārī and Muslim, many narrations within the collection have been criticized for their weak chains of transmission and problematic textual content. Nevertheless, the book holds substantial value in hadith studies, particularly as a comparative reference and a critical resource within the classical and modern scholarly traditions. Thus, al-Mustadrak remains an essential work for understanding the dynamics of hadith authenticity, transmission, and criticism throughout Islamic intellectual history.
The Application of Ushul Fiqh Principles in the Works of Dr. Sa'd bin Nashir al-Shatsri Abdul Basit; Fatur Fahrozi; Mujio Mujio; Imam Sucipto; Rizzaldy Satria Wiwaha
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i1.2950

Abstract

The global water crisis has become an urgent issue demanding responses from various disciplines, including Islamic law. Water wastage (israf al-ma’), as one of the contributors to this crisis, represents both an ethical-theological and ecological problem. This article aims to analyze the istinbat (legal derivation) methodology used to determine the ruling on water wastage, with a case study of the work of Dr. Sa'd bin Nashir asy-Syatsri. Using a qualitative content analysis method applied to the text “Application of the Principles of Ushul Fiqh to the Ruling on Israf (Excessiveness) in Water Usage,” this study maps the framework of Islamic jurisprudence in responding to the issue of excessive consumption. The results show that the establishment of the prohibition (tahrim) on water wastage is based on a solid argument, derived from 27 shar‘i evidences through the application of 13 ushul fiqh principles. These principles include dalalah lafziyyah (such as al-nahy yadullu ‘ala at-tahrim and al-wa‘id yadullu ‘ala at-tahrim), dalalah ma‘nawiyyah (such as mafhum muwafaqah and mafhum mukhalafah), as well as maqasid-based principles (such as ad-dawran ma‘al ‘illah and the prohibition of violating collective rights). This study affirms that ushul fiqh possesses a rich methodological capacity to provide normative foundations for addressing contemporary ecological challenges.
Hadith Criticism in Western Academia: Challenges and Opportunities Rayhan Ahmad Khairullah; Eka Purnama; Rizzaldy Satria Wiwaha; Engkos Kosasih; Irwan Abdurrahman
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i1.2954

Abstract

This study aims to examine the development of hadith criticism among Western scholars by highlighting its challenges and opportunities for contemporary Islamic studies. This research discusses how early Western scholars such as Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Schacht viewed hadith not as divine revelation but as a socio-political construction that emerged after the Prophet’s era, thus casting doubt on its authenticity and authority. This study employs a qualitative method with a library research approach. The primary sources consist of Western scholars’ works on hadith and the responses of contemporary Muslim scholars to them. The analysis is conducted using a descriptive-analytical method, describing the views of the Orientalists and analyzing their implications for modern hadith studies. Although Western hadith criticism raises doubts about the sources of Islamic law, it also provides significant opportunities for the development of contemporary hadith studies. Such criticism encourages Muslim scholars to strengthen classical methodologies with modern scientific approaches and opens space for cross-traditional academic dialogue. Through the integration of classical isnād criticism methods and modern historical approaches—as undertaken by contemporary Muslim scholars such as Jonathan A.C. Brown and Muhammad Mustafa al-A‘zami—hadith studies can now develop in a more comprehensive, objective, and contextual manner. Therefore, Western hadith criticism is not only a challenge to Islamic authority but also a means of reflection and methodological reinforcement in global hadith scholarship.
Co-Authors Abdul Basit Alfath Dadan Rusmana Devi Ganis Prameswari Eka Purnama Fatur Fahrozi Imam Sucipto Irwan Abdurrahman Jafar Shodiq Kosasih, Engkos Maulidya Harahap Muhammad Albaqir Mujio Mujio Neni Nurlaela Nisa Nur Fitria Rayhan Ahmad Khairullah