Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Armada Pendidikan
Zuraida Khairani
Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Ekasakti-Aai Padang
Education

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kemampuan Mengalihwacanakan Teks Negosiasi ke Bentuk Narasi Mungganakan Model Problem Based Learning Siswa Fase E SMK Negeri 6 Padang Zuraida Khairani; Najmi Hayati; Melati
JURNAL ARMADA PENDIDIKAN Vol 3 No 3 (2025): JURNAL ARMADA PENDIDIKAN
Publisher : Kilau Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60041/jap.v3i3.389

Abstract

This study is motivated by the finding that students have not yet fully developed the skills to transform negotiation texts into narrative form, particularly in expressing ideas and understanding the transformation process. The study aims to describe the ability of Phase E students at SMK Negeri 6 Padang to transform negotiation texts into narratives using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The research employed a descriptive quantitative method. The population consisted of 107 Phase E students in the 2024/2025 academic year, with a purposive sample of 35 students from Class X Culinary 3. Data were collected through a writing test in which students were asked to transform the negotiation text “Sewa Tanah” (sourced from the textbook) into a narrative text after learning through PBL. Students’ written work was assessed using an indicator-based scoring rubric and analyzed using descriptive statistics (means for each indicator and the overall mean). The results showed the mean scores for each indicator as follows: situation orientation 81.90 (Good), event development 74.28 (More than Adequate), rising conflict 67.62 (More than Adequate), climax 79.05 (Good), resolution 73.33 (More than Adequate), and coda 30.48 (Very Poor). The overall mean score was 69.20, which is below the minimum mastery criterion (KKTP) of 80.00. These findings indicate that PBL has not yet met the learning achievement standards for transforming negotiation texts into narratives in this context. The study recommends strengthening instruction focused on the stages of text transformation, providing intensive practice on weak indicators (especially the coda and conflict development), and improving lesson materials and the scoring rubric to help students’ achievement reach the KKTP.
Kemampuan Menulis Teks Eksposisi Berbasis Model Discovery Learning Siswa Fase X Negeri 8 PadangKemampuan Menulis Teks Eksposisi Berbasis Model Discovery Learning Siswa Fase X Negeri 8 Padang Kaniria; Zuraida Khairani; Najmi Hayati
JURNAL ARMADA PENDIDIKAN Vol 3 No 1 (2025): JURNAL ARMADA PENDIDIKAN
Publisher : Kilau Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60041/jap.v3i1.387

Abstract

This research is based on the fact that many students have difficulty in writing exposition texts, especially in determining the main idea, formulating problems, and choosing appropriate words and language to compose the thesis, arguments, and reaffirmation sections. The purpose of this study is to describe and explain the ability to write exposition texts based on the discovery learning model in phase X students at SMA Negeri 8 Padang. This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach. Data were obtained through performance tests and documentation, then analyzed by assessing students' writing results, giving scores, converting scores into grades, calculating averages, discussing, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the ability to write exposition texts with the discovery learning model was in the very good category, with an average value of 86.72, which was in the range of 86-95 on a scale of 10. This proves that the discovery learning model is effective in improving students' text writing, especially in the aspects of developing theses, arguments, and reaffirmation.
Analisis Butir Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI Akuntansi SMK Negeri 2 Padang Nada Salsabilla; Zuraida Khairani; Susanti Marisya
JURNAL ARMADA PENDIDIKAN Vol 3 No 3 (2025): JURNAL ARMADA PENDIDIKAN
Publisher : Kilau Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60041/jap.v3i3.391

Abstract

This study was motivated by the absence of item analysis for the Indonesian Language End-of-Semester Assessment (PAS) for the 2024/2025 academic year, so the quality of the test items in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level, discrimination power, and distractor effectiveness was unknown. The study aimed to analyze the quality of the PAS items and to identify whether the items were too easy or too difficult and whether they could differentiate between students who had mastered the content and those who had not. A descriptive quantitative method was employed. The data consisted of the test papers and students’ answer sheets from the odd-semester PAS 2024/2025. Students’ responses were tabulated by option choice and analyzed using measurement theory, covering item validity, test reliability, item difficulty, item discrimination, and distractor effectiveness. The results showed that in Package A, 7 items were valid (70%) and 3 were invalid (30%); the reliability was moderate (0.620); difficulty levels were dominated by the medium category (7 items; 70%) and easy category (3 items; 30%); discrimination indices were good to very good for 7 items (70%), but 3 items (30%) were poor; and all distractors were good to very good (100%). In Package B, 8 items were valid (80%) and 2 were invalid (20%); reliability was high (0.843); difficulty levels were dominated by easy items (6 items; 60%) and medium items (4 items; 40%); discrimination indices were good to very good for 7 items (70%), with 3 items (30%) in the fair to poor range; and distractors were good to very good for 9 items (90%), while 1 item (10%) had poor distractors. The study recommends revising or replacing invalid items and items with low discrimination, balancing item difficulty—especially in Package B—and conducting routine item analysis before reusing the test.
Co-Authors Kaniria Melati Nada Salsabilla Najmi Hayati Susanti Marisya