Luthfiah Mawar
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Sehati

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Modeling orthodox christian theological education in middle eastern conflict zones: a study of epistemological, dogmatic, hermeneutical, and ethical dimensions Murni Kasih Zebua; M. Agung Rahmadi; Luthfiah Mawar; Helsa Nasution; Nurzahara Sihombing
JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JPGI
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/026806jpgi0005

Abstract

This study offers an in-depth examination of the construction of Orthodox Christian theological education in Middle Eastern conflict zones, employing Confirmatory Factor Analysis under a MASEM framework to investigate four central dimensions: patristic epistemology, dogmatic rationality, the hermeneutics of tradition, and ethics. Through a meta-analytic approach that integrates online data from 847 institutional documents and 1,523 virtual respondents across Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, and Iraq from 2018 to 2024, the study identifies a structural model that demonstrates excellent goodness-of-fit indices, with χ²/df = 2.17, CFI = 0.946, TLI = 0.938, RMSEA = 0.054, and SRMR = 0.041. Patristic epistemology exhibits the highest loading factor (λ = 0.89, CR = 12.45, p < 0.001), with a substantial influence on academic resilience (β = 0.76, p < 0.001). In contrast, dogmatic rationality significantly strengthens theological identity stability (β = 0.68, p < 0.001). The hermeneutics of tradition reinforce communal cohesion (β = 0.71, p < 0.001), and ethics function as a significant mediator between theological constructs and altruistic behaviour in conflict zones (β = 0.63, p < 0.001). These findings extend the works of Makrides (2009), Iran (2020), and Papanikolaou (2012) by integrating psychological dimensions of education into Orthodox theology, while simultaneously generating a new empirical model that aligns patristic tradition with adaptive responses to collective trauma, resulting in an innovative theoretical framework for Orthodox theological education in conflict areas that balances doctrinal steadfastness with contextual elasticity.
Mobile Health Applications for Trauma Management in the Middle East Region Helsa Nasution; M. Agung Rahmadi; Rima Melati; Dinda Nurfadhilah; Siti Padila; Luthfiah Mawar; Nurzahara Sihombing; Sarah Mawaddah; Annisa Ardianti Br Tarigan
Antigen : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Ilmu Gizi Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February: Antigen : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Ilmu Gizi
Publisher : LPPM STIKES KESETIAKAWANAN SOSIAL INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57213/antigen.v4i1.963

Abstract

This meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of mobile health (mHealth) applications in trauma management in the Middle East region, based on a systematic review of 47 empirical studies with a total of 12,486 participants published between 2015 and 2024. The quantitative synthesis results indicate that implementing mHealth has a statistically significant impact on improving trauma management, with a strong pooled effect size (g=0.78, 95% CI [0.65, 0.91], p<.001). Subgroup analyses reveal that the highest effectiveness is observed in interventions targeting Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (g=0.86), followed by physical trauma management (g=0.74) and general psychological trauma (g=0.69). Further meta-regression findings identify the duration of application use (β=0.42, p<.001) and the level of intervention personalization (β=0.38, p<.01) as significant moderators influencing the magnitude of intervention effects. From an implementation perspective, user engagement reached 76.4%, and the retention rate was 68.2% after 6 months of use. Clinical outcome analyses demonstrate a significant reduction in PTSD scores with a mean difference of -14.6 points (p<.001) as well as a substantial improvement in quality of life (d=0.82). Comparatively, these findings extend the results of Goreis et al. (2020) and Kayrouz et al. (2018) by delineating more specifically the effectiveness of interventions in Middle Eastern populations. However, they differ from Yeager and Benight (2018) regarding the optimal duration of use. The principal contribution of this study lies in elucidating the central role of cultural adaptation, which shows a strong correlation with the effectiveness of mHealth applications (r=0.56, p<.001) in the context of trauma management in the Middle East.