Luthfin Mahamida
UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KRITIS: KEPEMIMPINAN DAN KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DI INDONESIA M. Hanif Satria Budi; Abd. Aziz; Nur Efendi; Miftakhul Maesaroh; Subhan Fathu Alam; Luthfin Mahamida
Salimiya: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): Salimiya
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Penerbitan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Islamic education plays a strategic role in shaping the character, morality, and intellectual development of the Indonesian nation while serving as an integral component of the national education system. However, the effectiveness of Islamic education implementation largely depends on the synergy between leadership and educational policies applied across institutional levels. This study aims to analyze leadership and Islamic education policies in Indonesia. The main issues examined include the analysis of Islamic education policies, the role of leaders in policy formulation, and the impact of these policies on the practice and management of Islamic education. This research employs a library research design with a descriptive qualitative approach, examining various academic literatures and recent studies from national sources. Data were analyzed using content analysis techniques through the stages of data reduction, thematic classification, theoretical interpretation, and deductive conclusion drawing. The results indicate that Islamic education policies in Indonesia focus on improving institutional quality through curriculum enhancement, teacher professionalism, modern governance, and leadership grounded in Islamic values. The integration of religious and general sciences is realized through policies such as the Merdeka Curriculum and Madrasah Reform Policy, which emphasize Islamic character formation. Furthermore, digitalization initiatives—such as EMIS, SIMPATIKA, and the Digital Madrasah program—have enhanced the efficiency and innovation of learning processes. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including managerial disparities and low levels of digital literacy. Therefore, future policies should strengthen transformational leadership, adaptive decentralization, and the integration of Islamic ethics within all educational institutions.
The Fragility of Plausibility Structures: Reconstructing the Social Foundation of Religious Moderation Policy in Indonesia Luthfin Mahamida
Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA) Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA)
Publisher : CV Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/jcpa.1531

Abstract

This article extends the author's previous research on the social construction of religious moderation in Indonesia by focusing on Peter L. Berger's concept of plausibility structures. Rather than revisiting the full dialectical framework of externalization, objectification, and internalization, it examines why religious moderation continues to experience a plausibility deficit despite its strong institutionalization through Presidential Regulation No. 58 of 2023. Using theoretical content analysis of policy documents and secondary data on freedom of religion or belief (2023–2024), the study argues that the primary challenge lies not in weak legal or bureaucratic instruments but in the absence of an organic social foundation that enables moderation values ​​to become part of everyday life. The analysis identifies three sources of bureaucratic plausibility fragility: dependence on political and budget cycles, the distance between policymakers and local communities, and limited intersubjective contact spaces. The study contributes by proposing four practical pillars for reconstructing an organic-cultural plausibility structure involving policymakers, educational institutions, and civil society, while recommending longitudinal research to examine the long-term sustainability and effectiveness of these strategies.