Ayun Hapsari
Universitas Terbuka

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Etika dan Regulasi Penggunaan Large Language Models dalam Praktik Hukum di Indonesia Ayun Hapsari; Mawardi
Jurnal Hukum Siber dan Regulasi Teknologi Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Sah Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The use of Large Language Models in legal practice in Indonesia is increasing in line with the digitalization of legal services and the development of artificial intelligence. The main issues that arise relate to the compatibility of such technology use with the ethical principles of the legal profession, as well as the adequacy of the national regulatory framework in governing it. This study employs a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach through analysis of legal norms, artificial-intelligence ethics policies, and legal doctrine. The findings show that Large Language Models offer benefits in improving efficiency and access to legal information, but also pose ethical risks in the form of algorithmic bias, misinterpretation of norms, and potential violations of confidentiality and data protection. The existing regulatory framework remains general in nature and has not yet specifically regulated the use of Large Language Models in legal practice. Therefore, strengthening regulations and developing specific ethical guidelines are necessary to ensure that the use of Large Language Models remains aligned with professional responsibility, the principle of prudence, and justice in legal practice in Indonesia.
State Digital Sovereignty in the Regulation of Global Social Media Platforms Adhe Ismail Ananda; Ayun Hapsari
Jurnal Hukum Siber dan Regulasi Teknologi Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Sah Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The globalization of digital space and the dominance of global social media platforms have created new challenges for states in maintaining sovereignty in cyberspace. Communication activities, information distribution, and the management of citizens’ data now largely take place on cross-border platforms controlled by global corporations. This situation raises questions regarding the limits of state authority in regulating social media platforms and its implications for freedom of expression, data protection, and national interests. This study employs a normative juridical approach by examining Indonesian legislation, principles of international law, and the doctrine of digital sovereignty. The findings show that state digital sovereignty represents an adaptation of the classical concept of sovereignty, emphasizing the state’s authority to regulate digital activities that affect its citizens and the public interest. The regulation of global social media platforms has a dual implication: it strengthens the protection of national interests while at the same time potentially restricting freedom of expression if not implemented proportionally. In addition, the strengthening of digital sovereignty poses the risk of internet fragmentation if it is not accompanied by a harmonious approach aligned with the principles of global openness. Therefore, a model of digital sovereignty regulation is required that balances state authority, the protection of human rights, and the need for international cooperation in order to build a fair and sustainable digital governance framework.
Ownership Disputes over Logos Generated by Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Indonesian Copyright and Trademark Law Ayun Hapsari; Magdalena Yoseva
Jurnal Hukum Siber dan Regulasi Teknologi Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Sah Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence to create logos has become increasingly common in digital business practice, especially among start-ups, micro and small enterprises, content creators, and marketplace sellers that need visual identity quickly and at low cost. Legal problems arise when an AI-generated logo is claimed by more than one party, registered as a trademark, used commercially, or alleged to resemble an earlier logo. This article examines ownership disputes over AI-generated logos from the perspective of Indonesian copyright and trademark law. The research uses a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis shows that Indonesian copyright law remains centered on human authorship, while trademark law focuses on distinctiveness, good faith, registration, and use of signs in trade. Therefore, disputes over AI-generated logos cannot be resolved through a single legal regime. Copyright protection depends on the existence of sufficient human creative contribution in designing, selecting, modifying, and finalizing the logo, whereas trademark protection depends on distinctiveness, absence of similarity with prior marks, good faith, and commercial use. This article proposes a layered dispute-resolution model that evaluates human contribution, AI service contracts, the origin of prompts and outputs, similarity risks, trademark examination, and evidence of commercial use.