Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dedikasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) International Journal for Advanced Research
Chairus Suriyati
Universitas Battuta
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Konsekuensi Hukum Tawuran Pelajar: Bukan Jagoan Tapi Perilaku Kriminal Anak di SMAS Mulia Medan: Legal Consequences of Student Brawls: Not Heroism, But Criminal Behavior Among Children at SMAS Mulia Medan Fardah Rizki Amanda; Indri Adelia; Eric; Chairus Suriyati
Bestari: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 6 No 2 (2026): Mei 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Melawi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46368/dpkm.v6i2.4970

Abstract

Abstrak Pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini dilatarbelakangi oleh masih adanya persepsi keliru di kalangan pelajar yang memandang tawuran sebagai bentuk solidaritas dan keberanian, padahal secara hukum merupakan perilaku kriminal anak dengan konsekuensi pidana serius. Kegiatan dilaksanakan di SMAS Mulia Medan dengan melibatkan 30 siswa, melalui pendekatan participatory legal education dengan metode penyuluhan interaktif, diskusi kelompok, studi kasus, serta evaluasi menggunakan pre-test dan post-test berupa 5 pertanyaan singkat. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan pemahaman hukum siswa sebesar 27%, disertai perubahan sikap yang signifikan terhadap penolakan tawuran serta meningkatnya kemampuan mengidentifikasi solusi konflik secara damai. Kegiatan ini membuktikan bahwa edukasi hukum yang terstruktur dan partisipatif efektif pada aspek peningkatan pemahaman siswa mengenai konsekuensi pidana tawuran, perubahan persepsi terhadap tawuran yang semula dipandang sebagai solidaritas, dan penyelesaian konflik secara damai dilingkungan sekolah. Kata Kunci: Tawuran Pelajar, Konsekuensi Hukum, Edukasi Hukum Abstract: This community service activity was initiated due to the persistent misconception among students who perceive school brawls as symbols of solidarity and bravery, whereas legally they constitute juvenile criminal behavior with serious legal consequences. The program was conducted at SMAS Mulia Medan involving 30 students, using a participatory legal education approach through interactive legal counseling, group discussions, case studies, and evaluation employing pre-test and post-test instruments in the form of 5 short questions. The results demonstrated a 27% increase in students’ legal understanding, accompanied by significant attitudinal changes reflecting rejection of violent behavior and improved ability to identify peaceful conflict resolution strategies. This activity provesthat structured and participatory legal education is effective in enhancing students understanding of the criminal consequences of brawls, changing perceptions of brawls that were initially seen as solidarity, and peacefully resolving conflicts within the school environment. Keywords: Student Brawls, Legal Consequences, Legal Education
The Trial by Social Media Phenomenon: Its Implications on Judges' Conviction and the Protection of Judicial Independence Irwansyah Tanjung; Chairus Suriyati
International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : CERED Indonesia Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53695/injects.v6i2.1661

Abstract

The influence of social media pressure on the process of forming a judge's conviction within the Indonesian criminal justice system corresponds with the advancement of digital technology, which has shifted the pattern of public oversight from trial by the press to trial by social media, thereby shaping a court of public opinion. Sociological phenomena such as the “No Viral, No Justice” movement and justice outsourcing generate psychological pressure that potentially encourages the practice of judicial populism. Consequently, the independence of the judicial power and the cognitive independence of judges in evaluating evidence pursuant to Articles 183 and 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) face tangible external challenges. Utilizing a normative legal research method with approaches in the sociology of law, legal realism, statutory examination, conceptual analysis, and case studies, this research formulates solutions for institutional protection. The findings indicate the necessity of reactualizing the contempt of court doctrine and the sub judice rule, supported by Article 281 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Penal Code. Furthermore, the panel of judges may optimize its functional authority through procedural discretion, consisting of restricting live broadcasting (live streaming) and applying publication restriction orders (gag orders) to ensure a fair trial. The discovery of material truth must remain grounded in trial facts, rather than digital trends.
Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Aborsi di Kecamatan Tanjung Morawa (Studi di Kantor Kepolisian Resort Kota Deli Serdang) Juliandi Juliandi; Talita Syamantha; Chairus Suriyati; Junaidi Lubis
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 19 No 01 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 19 No 01 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v19i01.1514

Abstract

Abortion is criminal act. So that in law enforcement, the village, sub-district and so on governments should also be involved in providing information about the dangers of abortion crimes, especially to families and young generations in Tanjung Morawa District. Abortion crimes that occurred in Tanjung Morawa District, Deliserdang Regency also increased from the previous 15 incidents in 2022 and around 28 incidents until 2025. Of course, this criminal act of abortion must be carried out by law enforcement so that in the future the same criminal act will not be repeated in the future. Many individuals commit the crime of abortion secretly, and most of them are assisted by people who do not have adequate training. The obejctives of the research include to enforce criminal law for every abortion perpetrator, especially in Tanjung Morawa District. The topic was chosen because of a sense of concern in the people of Tanjung Morawa to be more responsible and not to have abortions for various specific reasons. Combinations normative and empirical to describe and explain events from various reference sources and the study's findings, which included interviews with members of the Deliserdang Resort police, revealed that the dread of becoming pregnant outside of marriage led to a number of criminal abortions, having free sex, and lack of responsibility from the male side. With this research, in the future the crime of abortion can be minimized in Tanjung Morawa sub-district.
The Urgency of Criminal Law Reform to Adapt to the Development of Information Technology Junaidi Lubis; Chairus Suriyati; M. Salim
International Journal For Advanced Research Vol. 1 No. 6: April 2025
Publisher : Outline Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61730/6wxx1c52

Abstract

The advancement of information technology has significantly altered the landscape of crime and law enforcement. Traditional criminal law frameworks, which were designed to address conventional offenses, are increasingly inadequate in responding to modern digital crimes such as cyber fraud, hacking, data theft, and online defamation. This research explores the urgency of criminal law reform in Indonesia to ensure legal instruments remain effective and relevant in the face of technological change. Using a normative legal method and supported by qualitative data, this study analyzes current legislation, including the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), and identifies its limitations in dealing with crimes facilitated by information technology. The research highlights the gaps in definitions, enforcement procedures, and jurisdictional challenges that emerge from transnational and anonymous digital offenses. The findings show a pressing need to reform criminal law by incorporating more adaptive legal definitions, strengthening cybercrime investigation mechanisms, and enhancing interagency cooperation. Additionally, the research suggests aligning national laws with international cybercrime standards to foster more effective cross-border enforcement. Reforming criminal law is not only necessary for justice but also for protecting digital society from evolving threats.
Co-Authors Eric Fardah Rizki Amanda Indri Adelia Irwansyah Tanjung Juliandi Juliandi Junaidi Lubis Junaidi Lubis M. Salim Talita Syamantha