Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

State-Sponsored Qur’anic Exegesis and Interreligious Relations: A Comparative Study of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia Aksin Wijaya; Ahmad Zainal Abidin; Muh Syaifudin
Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Alumni dan Santri Mahyajatul Qurro'

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53754/iscs.v5i2.854

Abstract

This article explores how three state-sponsored Qurʾānic exegeses-al-Muntakhab (Egypt), al-Muyassar (Saudi Arabia), and al-Wajiz (Indonesia)-conceptualize the essence of religion and articulate models of interreligious relations. These tafsirs are selected because they are produced by official state institutions and therefore reflect the ideological orientations and religious policies of their respective governments. Employing a qualitative comparative method, this study combines theoretical hermeneutics to reconstruct the historical meanings of the tafsirs with philosophical hermeneutics to assess their relevance for contemporary Indonesian society. The analysis focuses on three dimensions: methodological identity, the conception of religion in terms of unity and diversity, and approaches to interreligious relations encompassing dialogue, social harmony, and cooperation. The findings demonstrate that although the three tafsirs share fundamental theological premises-such as monotheism, prophetic continuity, and moral universality-they differ significantly in interpretive orientation. Al-Muntakhab reflects a rational-moderate Azhari tradition, al-Muyassar adopts a scripturalist Salafi framework with exclusivist tendencies, while al-Wajiz advances an inclusive and accommodative hermeneutic aligned with Indonesia’s pluralistic ethos and the principle of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. This study argues that state-sponsored tafsir functions not merely as a religious text but as an ideological instrument that shapes public religious discourse. When oriented toward justice, equality, and interreligious cooperation, such tafsir can contribute meaningfully to religious moderation in plural societies.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF DEBTORS IN FISHING GEAR PROCUREMENT AGREEMENTS FROM A MAQASHID PERSPECTIVE SYARI'AH Rosikhan Anwar; Muh Syaifudin
TAWASUT Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL TAWASUT
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Wahid hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/ta.v12i1.13506

Abstract

This study aims to describe the problems and impacts of the procurement of fishing gear in the Bonang Subdistrict, Demak Regency community in terms of maqashid shari'ah. Efforts can be made to improve the fishing gear procurement agreement to comply with applicable laws. This research uses a legal sociology or empirical juridical research approach. The data collection techniques used are observation, documentation, and interviews. The results of this study indicate that Legal problems that occur in the fishing gear procurement agreement in Bonang Sub-District, Demak Regency, arise for several reasons: the debtor does not have capital, the deal is only made based on mutual trust, there is no black on white. The capital provider gets a share of 1 crew member every time the juragan goes to sea with the principal debt still the debtor's responsibility (juragan). The creditor does not want to because he will no longer receive a share of the crew when the debt is repaid. In addition, it often happens that when the jagan goes bankrupt and the fishing gear is sold, the debtor does not return the total amount of money, sometimes only 50 percent. Agreements in conventional law are regulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Meanwhile, in Sharia economic law, the agreement leads to usury because an addition (mbageni) in the debt and credit agreement for procuring fishing gear is detrimental to the debtor.