Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.813
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Politic and Government Studies
Supratiwi Supratiwi
Program studi S1 ilmu pemerintahan
Arts Humanities

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Dalam Bayang-Bayang Rezim Kebenaran: Analisis Foucauldian atas Wacana Revitalisasi Danau Rawa Pening Ade Putra Suryana; Supratiwi Supratiwi
Journal of Politic and Government Studies Vol 15, No 2 (2026): Volume 15, No 2 : Periode Wisuda April 2026
Publisher : Journal of Politic and Government Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The revitalization of Lake Rawa Pening as part of a priority lake rescue program not only presents technical environmental policies, but also gives rise to a contestation of discourse between the government and residents living around the lake. The purpose of this study is to analyze the formation of discourse between the government and residents in the revitalization of Lake Rawa Pening and to examine the process of discourse contestation that occurs between the two. This study uses a qualitative approach with Foucauldian discourse analysis and the New Social Movement framework. Data to support this research was obtained through in-depth interviews, documentation, and field observations. The results of this study show that the government formed a “critical” discourse on the lake through scientific legitimacy, regulation, and institutional authority to justify revitalization, including dredging, land control, and lake expansion. On the other hand, residents construct a counter-discourse using collective memory, land ownership archives, culture, and life experiences that affirm their rights to living space. The process of discourse struggle involves the reversal of meaning, mobilization of public opinion, and the transformation of resistance into an organized New Social Movement. Based on these findings, the recommendation that can be given to the government is to change its technocratic approach to more participatory policy communication by paying attention to local narratives and the collective memory of residents. For residents, it is recommended to strengthen the consolidation of collective identity as bargaining power for advocacy with the government.
IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PENGEMBANGAN RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU DI KOTA ADMINISTRASI JAKARTA BARAT Annaya Raisha Firmansyah; Supratiwi Supratiwi
Journal of Politic and Government Studies Vol 15, No 2 (2026): Volume 15, No 2 : Periode Wisuda April 2026
Publisher : Journal of Politic and Government Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Green Open Space (RTH) is a crucial component for urban environmental sustainability and community quality of life. However, West Jakarta Administrative City has the lowest RTH achievement in DKI Jakarta, reaching only 1.53% of the total area, far from the statutory target of 30%, with no addition of RTH area since 2019. This study aims to analyze the implementation of RTH development policy based on Governor Regulation Number 9 of 2022 and identify obstacles occurring in the field. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method using George C. Edward III's policy implementation model approach, encompassing four indicators: communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The results of the study show that the implementation of Green Open Space development in the West Jakarta Administrative City has not been carried out properly due to top-down policy communication with limited socialization, very minimal financial resources (0.1% of the total regional budget) without a land acquisition budget since 2019, weak executive disposition when dealing with economic interests, and a fragmented bureaucratic structure with coordination dependent on leadership intervention. This shows that implementation barriers are not isolated but multidimensional and systemic. The conclusion of this study confirms that the root of the problem is not merely technical, but rather the absence of political will to make green spaces a priority. Therefore, it is necessary to reallocate the budget based on regional priorities, enforce strict laws against spatial planning violations, and improve cross-sector coordination mechanisms.
TOP-DOWN COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE : DINAMIKA KOLABORASI MULTI AKTOR DALAM PENGELOLAAN PROGRAM KAMPUNG IKLIM DI KELURAHAN TUGUREJO KOTA SEMARANG Rizka Utami; Supratiwi Supratiwi
Journal of Politic and Government Studies Vol 15, No 2 (2026): Volume 15, No 2 : Periode Wisuda April 2026
Publisher : Journal of Politic and Government Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Climate change is a global phenomenon whose impacts are particularly felt in coastal areas, including Tugurejo Village. The main challenge in climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts lies in the complexity of climate change issues, which cannot be addressed by a single actor but require cross-sectoral synergy. This study aims to analyze collaborative governance practices in the management of the Climate Village program in Tugurejo Village using the Ansell and Gash model. The focus of this study is to examine the roles of stakeholders and the dynamics of collaboration among government actors, academics, the private sector, and the community. The research method employed is descriptive qualitative. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and document analysis. Data analysis was conducted based on the collaborative governance theory developed by Ansell and Gash. The research findings indicate that the Proklim program in Tugurejo Village tends to be top-down in nature. A significant power imbalance was identified, with the Semarang City Environmental Agency dominating as both the initiator and the entity determining the direction of the work. Furthermore, the institutional design, which remains informal, and the reliance on a “local hero” figure make the program’s sustainability vulnerable to external changes. The conclusion of this study is that collaborative practices in Tugurejo are more of an instructive coordination than an equal partnership, thus requiring the strengthening of a more formal institutional design and the redistribution of power and knowledge. Therefore, it is recommended that cooperation be formalized in writing and that leadership regeneration at the grassroots level be strengthened to ensure the program’s autonomy in the future.
Co-Authors Ade Putra Suryana Ahmad Aufa Kholqi Alden Farrel Wibawa Annaya Raisha Firmansyah Fitriyah Fitriyah Girindra Sri Ayu Kusuma Djanabadra Hary Gunarso Jennifer Evelyn Sartika Silalahi Jessica Xena Boru Namora Muhammad Azhar Gusti Abdurrafi Nanda Lintang Tyas Pratiwi Radinka Wastu Amanta Rizka Utami