Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Positum PESHUM
Andi Rima Febrina Sari
Universitas Nusa Cendana
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tanggung Jawab Korporasi Dalam Kekerasan Eksekusi Fidusia: Analisis Yuridis Peristiwa Kalibata 2025 Iber Dedy Kornel Tanesib; Andi Rima Febrina Sari
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4: Juni 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i4.19132

Abstract

Insiden Kalibata pada 11 Desember 2025 menandai puncak dari lemahnya sistem jaminan fidusia di Indonesia . Riset ini fokus pada kajian mengenai akuntabilitas perusahaan, ditinjau dari dua aspek hukum: pertama, pertanggungjawaban perdata melalui prinsip tanggung jawab perwakilan , dan kedua, pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Melalui pendekatan penelitian yuridis normatif dan studi kasus, ditemukan fakta bahwa tindak kekerasan yang merenggut nyawa MET dan NAT disebabkan oleh kejahatan sistematis perusahaan terhadap prosedur pelaksanaan , yang bertentangan dengan Putusan MK No. 18/PUU XVII/2019. Guna mencegah praktik hakim utama sendiri di masyarakat, penegakan hukum harus menyasar hingga ke tingkat korporasi . Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa korporasi tidak bisa lepas tanggung jawab dengan dalih ketidakterlibatan langsung atas perbuatan pihak lain. Sebaliknya, PERMA No. 13 Tahun 2016 mewajibkan korporasi untuk memikul tanggung jawab tidak langsung , baik secara perdata maupun melalui sanksi pidana berupa atribusi. Penerapan hukum pada tingkat korporasi krusial guna mencegah munculnya praktik eigenrichting (pengalihan tanggung jawab tak langsung) di tengah masyarakat.
Kewenangan Atributif Jaksa dalam Permohonan Pembatalan Perkawinan Tanpa Izin dalam Menjaga Ketertiban Umum Fadli Rahman Wahidi; Anizar Ayu Pratiwi; Andi Rima Febrina Sari
Jurnal Hukum Positum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Positum
Publisher : Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35706/positum.v10i2.13247

Abstract

Marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman within a household, legally recognized as husband and wife. The State Attorney (Jaksa Pengacara Negara or JPN), as a functional official, is granted unlimited authority not only in the criminal sphere but also in annulling marriages if they do not have permission according to the provisions of the Marriage Law. The writing methodology in this scientific work is the normative juridical method and library research. This research shows that marriage annulment can be done if the following conditions are not met: the marriage registrar and the person performing the marriage do not have the right or are not authorized, there is still a valid marriage status or the person is in the iddah period when the marriage is performed, there are fewer than two witnesses, the marriage was performed under pressure or threat, and the person is not of legal age to marry according to the law. The role of the prosecutor as a law enforcer and in accordance with statutory provisions gives them authority in civil matters. The prosecutor can file for annulment of the marriage by acting as the petitioner without being required to use a special power of attorney. Keywords: State Attorney; Marriage Without Permission; Marriage Annulment.
Co-Authors Anizar Ayu Pratiwi Fadli Rahman Wahidi Iber Dedy Kornel Tanesib