Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Inovasi media pembelajaran halal berbasis kartu kuartet: Systematic literature review Didik Darmansyah; Neneng Windayani; Ateng Supriyatna
Journal of Halal Industry Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Halal Industry Studies
Publisher : Nur Science Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53088/jhis.v5i2.2667

Abstract

Quartet card-based learning media has emerged as a promising game-based approach for science and halal education, yet its application in halal science education remains insufficiently synthesized. This systematic literature review (SLR) followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and reviewed 35 peer-reviewed articles (2021–2026) selected from 1,847 records across major academic databases. The synthesis identified five themes: educational card game design, learning effectiveness, halal literacy integration, student engagement, and media assessment. Findings indicate that quartet cards improve student engagement (mean effect size d = 0.71), halal conceptual understanding, and science process skills, particularly when integrated with inquiry-based learning and validated content. However, significant gaps remain, including limited longitudinal research, scarce studies in formal secondary-level halal science education (Tadris IPA), and the absence of standardized assessment instruments. This review proposes the Halal Science Game-Based Learning Framework (HS-GBLF) as a theoretical model integrating constructivist learning, game-based pedagogy, and halal literacy competencies.
EMPIRICAL VALIDITY OF SCIENCE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS BASED ON PROBLEM SOLVING ON ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC AND ENERGY MATERIALS Didik Darmansyah; Ida Farida Chaidir; Ade Yeti Nuryantini
Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan Vol. 11 No. 02 (2025): Juli - Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/ptk.v11i02.19385

Abstract

Abstract This research is motivated by the low problem-solving ability of students and the dominance of low-level cognitive instruments (LOTS) compiled by teachers, which often fail to accurately measure high reasoning power. The purpose of this study is to analyze the empirical validity of problem-solving-based science assessment instruments on electrical, magnetic, and alternative energy materials. The research method used was quantitative descriptive involving 32 students in grade IX. Data were collected through multiple-choice test instruments and analyzed using the Anates 4.0.9 program and SPSS to measure validity, reliability, difficulty level (ITK), and differentiating power (IDB). The results showed that 65% of the questions were declared empirically valid with a very high reliability coefficient of 0.870. The level of difficulty was dominated by the medium category (60%), but it was found that 35% of the questions had poor discriminating power. Qualitative findings from expert validators also reveal gaps in the synchronization between indicators and image stimuli in magnetic matter. It can be concluded that this instrument meets the requirements for strong measurement regularity, but requires improvements in the synchronization aspect of contextual stimuli to measure high-level thinking skills (HOTS). Overall, 55% of the questions are suitable for immediate use, 30% need revision, and 15% must be discarded. Keywords: Empirical Validity, Science Assessment Instruments, Problem Solving, Question Item Analysis