Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Sosial dan Politik International Journal of Social Service and Research Jurnal Lingkar Mutu Pendidikan Jurnal Lingkar Mutu Pendidikan
Prasetya Yoga Santoso
Universitas Sahid
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH INTENSITAS PENGGUNAAN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TERHADAP BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA Prasetya Yoga Santoso; Ressa Uli Patrissia
Jurnal Lingkar Mutu Pendidikan Vol 23 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Lingkar Mutu Pendidikan
Publisher : LPMP Provinsi DKI Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54124/jlmp.v23i1.192

Abstract

This study examines the effect of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) usage on the critical thinking skills and learning outcomes of university students in Indonesia. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of AI literacy as a moderating variable, which has not been studied simultaneously in the context of Indonesian higher education. The study employed a one-shot case study pre-experimental method with 50 students as samples, divided into three groups based on Gen AI usage intensity: low (n=16), moderate (n=17), and high (n=17). Data were analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results revealed significant differences in critical thinking skills (F(2,47) = 18.43, p < .001) and learning outcomes (F(2,47) = 22.17, p < .001) among the three groups. The high-intensity Gen AI group obtained the highest mean critical thinking score (M = 84.71, SD = 5.34) and the best learning outcomes (M = 87.12, SD = 4.91). This study recommends structured integration of Gen AI into higher education curricula accompanied by enhanced AI literacy for students.
PENGARUH INTENSITAS PENGGUNAAN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TERHADAP BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA Prasetya Yoga Santoso; Ressa Uli Patrissia
Jurnal Lingkar Mutu Pendidikan Vol 23 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Lingkar Mutu Pendidikan
Publisher : LPMP Provinsi DKI Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54124/jlmp.v23i1.192

Abstract

This study examines the effect of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) usage on the critical thinking skills and learning outcomes of university students in Indonesia. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of AI literacy as a moderating variable, which has not been studied simultaneously in the context of Indonesian higher education. The study employed a one-shot case study pre-experimental method with 50 students as samples, divided into three groups based on Gen AI usage intensity: low (n=16), moderate (n=17), and high (n=17). Data were analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results revealed significant differences in critical thinking skills (F(2,47) = 18.43, p < .001) and learning outcomes (F(2,47) = 22.17, p < .001) among the three groups. The high-intensity Gen AI group obtained the highest mean critical thinking score (M = 84.71, SD = 5.34) and the best learning outcomes (M = 87.12, SD = 4.91). This study recommends structured integration of Gen AI into higher education curricula accompanied by enhanced AI literacy for students.
The Role of Political Communication by President Klaus Werner Iohannis in Confronting Populist Groups (Euroskepticism) Bambang Prihartadi; T Titi Widaningsih; Heri Budianto; Andi Faisal Bakti; Prasetya Yoga Santoso
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i8.1466

Abstract

Romania’s integration into the European Union has faced growing challenges from populist and Eurosceptic groups that frame EU membership as a threat to sovereignty, economic security, and national identity. This study examined President Klaus Werner Iohannis’s political communication in defending Romania’s EU membership and formulated an integrative attribution-based communication model. Using a constructivist paradigm, the research applied a qualitative case-study method and a transdisciplinary approach combining political communication, political science, international relations, and media studies. Data were analyzed using Kelley’s covariation attribution theory, van Dijk’s discourse structure analysis, concepts of populism, and EU values. The findings showed that Iohannis consistently constructed a pro-EU and Euro-Atlantic narrative by emphasizing democracy, human rights, security, prosperity, and institutional cooperation. An analysis of 45 Twitter posts from July 2021 to January 2022 indicated that 40% focused on EU cooperation, 42% addressed bilateral, regional, and multilateral relations aligned with EU policies, 13% focused on the United States, and 4% concerned NATO. His communication reflected low consensus, high consistency, and low distinctiveness, indicating strong internal attribution. The study concluded that Strategic Political Communication Attribution could help explain how political leaders counter populist narratives while sustaining international integration agendas and reinforcing public support for Romania’s long-term European political orientation and stability.
ASEAN Political Communication in Responding to Donald Trump’s 2025 Tariff Policy: A Framing and Agenda-Setting Analysis of Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia Yusnaini Yusnaini; Hayatun Nufus; Lusiana Indira Isni; Prasetya Yoga Santoso
Jurnal Studi Sosial dan Politik Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Studi Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/jssp.v10i1.35981

Abstract

This paper examines and compares the political communication strategies employed by Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia in response to the reciprocal tariff policy imposed by President Donald Trump in April 2025. Using a qualitative approach and reliable media sources, this analysis focuses on four main aspects: government rhetoric, media involvement and framing, position in the global discourse, and crisis communication strategies. The results of the study show that Indonesia prioritizes a cooperative and defensive approach, emphasizing the stability of bilateral relations with the United States. Singapore emerged as a responsive and systematic technocratic actor, forming a national task force and engaging in data-driven communication. Meanwhile, Malaysia used this crisis to articulate its normative position, call for ASEAN solidarity, and emphasize fairness in the global trading system. The three countries demonstrated variations in their political communication capacities and orientations, reflecting their respective foreign policy structures, national media characteristics, and diplomatic approaches. This study emphasizes that political communication is not merely a response to an economic crisis but a strategic instrument in shaping narratives, strengthening bargaining positions, and maintaining national credibility amid the evolving global protectionist landscape.
Co-Authors Andi Faisal Bakti Bambang Prihartadi Hayatun Nufus Heri Budianto Lusiana Indira Isni Ressa Uli Patrissia T Titi Widaningsih Yusnaini Yusnaini