Indra Lesmana
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tantangan Legalitas UMKM di Indonesia: Upaya Pemerintah dalam Penerbitan NIB Untuk Mendukung Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kabupaten Bantul Syafira Elena; Indra Lesmana; Helen Dian Fridayani; Achmad Nurmandi
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political UMA) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v14i1.17197

Abstract

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) play a vital role in driving regional economic growth; however, the level of business legality, as indicated by Business Identification Number (NIB) ownership, remains uneven across regions. This study aims to analyze the spatial distribution of MSMEs and disparities in NIB ownership in Bantul Regency, and to examine the role of the local government in promoting business formalization. A mixed-methods approach is employed, combining qualitative descriptive analysis with spatial analysis using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Secondary data were collected from local government agencies, the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), and relevant scientific literature, covering approximately 96,000 MSMEs at the subdistrict level. Data analysis was conducted using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, integrated with spatial mapping techniques. The findings reveal that while MSMEs are widely distributed, NIB ownership remains uneven, particularly in peripheral areas. This disparity is influenced by limited digital literacy, unequal access to digital infrastructure, and variations in government outreach and institutional capacity. The study highlights that spatial factors and governance effectiveness significantly shape business legality. It contributes to the literature by incorporating spatial perspectives into MSME legality studies and emphasizes the importance of place-based policy interventions to support inclusive and sustainable business formalization.
Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Akibat Pertambangan Batubara di Kabupaten Berau: Analisis Peran Pemerintah Daerah Indra Lesmana; Syafira Elena; Eko Priyo Purnomo
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political UMA) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v14i2.18594

Abstract

Coal mining remains strategically important for energy and economic development. Yet, Indonesia's Law No. 3 of 2020 recentralized mining authority, leaving local governments responsible for its environmental consequences without the enforcement authority previously held to address them. Prior research examines government responsibility, authority recentralization, and weak field-level supervision separately, without linking them to explain how authority redistribution reshapes local implementation capacity the gap this study addresses. Using George C. Edward III's policy implementation framework, this study analyzes environmental management policy implementation in Berau Regency, East Kalimantan, through a descriptive qualitative approach based on 100 online news documents (2020-2025). Documents were coded in NVivo using a deductive-inductive framework built around four governance indicators: supervision, permitting, environmental impact, and conflict, cross-tabulated against government, companies, and communities via Matrix Coding Query, then interpreted through Edward III's four dimensions. A supplementary VOSviewer mapping of 1,500 Scopus articles corroborated the research gap, not the primary analysis. Findings show government-linked coding concentrated in supervision (25%) and permitting (30%) without corresponding enforcement effectiveness. In comparison, communities and companies dominate environmental-impact (28%, 27%) and conflict coding (26% each), with the government lowest (20%) in conflict mediation. These patterns reflect resource, communication, and disposition constraints within a bureaucratic structure where the Regency Government lost permit-revocation authority to the central government while retaining local environmental management burdens, an implementation gap rather than improved governance, extending Edward III's framework to multi-level governance. Policy implications include standing environmental monitoring, formal local involvement in central enforcement, and binding tripartite mediation among government, companies, and communities.