Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal An Namatul Ausath MUMTAZ: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Advances In Education Journal
Imron Fauzi
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Curriculum Instability and the Future of Islamic Education in Indonesia: Lessons from the Decentralized Education System in the United States Jasuli; Imron Fauzi; Ali Saeed
MUMTAZ : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam, Fakultas Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Ibrahimy Genteng Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69552/mumtaz.v6i1.3747

Abstract

This study examines curriculum instability and its implications for the future of Islamic education in Indonesia through a comparative analysis of the decentralized educational governance system in the United States. The study aims to analyze how centralized curriculum policies and repeated educational reforms affect the sustainability, adaptability, and institutional resilience of Islamic educational institutions in Indonesia. This research employed a qualitative approach using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. A total of 77 scholarly references published between 2019 and 2026 were analyzed using the PRISMA framework and thematic analysis. The review focused on curriculum instability, centralized governance, Islamic educational transformation, and decentralized educational systems. The findings reveal that curriculum instability in Indonesia reflects a structural governance problem characterized by policy discontinuity, centralized decision-making, and fragmented educational implementation. These conditions create significant challenges for pesantren, madrasahs, and Islamic schools in maintaining institutional sustainability and educational identity. In contrast, the decentralized educational governance system in the United States demonstrates how institutional autonomy, adaptive policymaking, and contextual flexibility may strengthen educational resilience and curriculum sustainability. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of curriculum instability, comparative educational governance, and Islamic educational transformation within a single analytical framework. This study contributes theoretically by positioning curriculum instability as a governance-based issue affecting the future sustainability of Islamic education. Practically, the findings offer strategic insights for reconstructing adaptive, collaborative, and future-oriented Islamic educational governance in Indonesia.
Analisis Efektivitas Kurikulum 2013 Dan Kurikulum Merdeka Terhadap Perkembangan Kognitif Siswa Sekolah Dasar Sofwan Roif Ubaidillah amalia; Khoiriyah muzakki; Imron Fauzi; Mukni'ah Mukni'ah
An Namatul Ausath Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Publish
Publisher : PGMI ISMAA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64431/annamatulausath.v3i1.305

Abstract

Abstrak: Perubahan kurikulum pendidikan di Indonesia merupakan respons terhadap tantangan zaman dan kebutuhan untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran. Dua kurikulum utama yang menjadi fokus adalah Kurikulum 2013 (K13) dan Kurikulum Merdeka (Kumer). K13 menekankan pendekatan ilmiah dan integrasi antara sikap, pengetahuan, serta keterampilan, namun menghadapi kendala seperti padatnya materi dan adaptasi guru. Sebaliknya, Kumer dirancang lebih fleksibel dan berpusat pada peserta didik, memberikan ruang eksplorasi sesuai minat dan kebutuhan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas kedua kurikulum dalam mendukung perkembangan kognitif siswa sekolah dasar. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kuantitatif dengan statistik deskriptif pada siswa SD Negeri Kaliwates, Jember. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Kumer lebih unggul dalam mendorong keterampilan berpikir kritis, pemecahan masalah, dan kreativitas melalui pembelajaran berbasis proyek. Meskipun K13 juga mendorong keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi, struktur yang kaku dan beban materi membatasi efektivitasnya. Oleh karena itu, Kumer dinilai lebih adaptif terhadap tahapan perkembangan kognitif siswa. Temuan ini memberikan rekomendasi penting untuk pengembangan kebijakan kurikulum yang lebih relevan dan mendukung pembelajaran yang bermakna di jenjang sekolah dasar
Analisis Desain Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Kualitas Laporan Penelitian: Kajian Systematic Literature Review Stella Dinda Dian Adisti; Nur Hidayah; Valentino Rahma Febrian; Intan Azzahro; Imron Fauzi
Advances In Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026): Advances In Education Journal (Juni)
Publisher : Yayasan Al-Afif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Classroom Action Research (CAR) is a practice-based research approach that has the potential to improve the quality of learning through a continuous cycle of action and reflection. However, the quantitative growth in CAR publications has not been accompanied by a commensurate improvement in the methodological quality of resulting research reports. This study aims to analyze the design characteristics of CAR and identify factors influencing the quality of research reports. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The literature search was conducted across four international academic databases Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar using a combination of keywords based on Boolean operators. The search yielded 127 articles, which were screened through three stages based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 10 articles for further analysis. Data synthesis was conducted using a thematic narrative synthesis approach. The results indicate that most CAR research is oriented toward improving learning outcomes, however, recurring methodological weaknesses were identified, including: unclear problem formulations, weak coherence between action design and research objectives, limitations in data analysis techniques, and insufficient depth in the reflection process. This study contributes to the development of an evaluative framework for CAR designs that can serve as a reference for researchers in improving methodological standards and scientific credibility of CAR reports.
Co-Authors Ali Saeed Intan Azzahro Jasuli Khoiriyah muzakki Mukni'ah Mukni'ah Nur Hidayah Sofwan Roif Ubaidillah amalia Stella Dinda Dian Adisti Valentino Rahma Febrian