Heppy Hyma Puspytasari
Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI DAN IMPLIKASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PEMASYARAKATAN TERHADAP PERUBAHAN SOSIAL WARGA BINAAN PEMASYARAKATAN Herdycha Surya Kisworo; Heppy Hyma Puspytasari
Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara Islam, Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/qaumiyyah.v6i1.198

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation and implications of Law Nomor 22of 2022 on Corrections for social changes among inmates at the Tangerang Youth Correctional Facility Class IIA. Using an empirical juridical method, this research combines normative legal analysis with field data collected through literature review, interviews, and direct observation. The findings indicate that Law Nomor 22of 2022 simplifies remission and integration procedures by eliminating the requirement for a Justice Collaborator (JC), providing fairer opportunities for inmates to participate in rehabilitation programs. This has increased participation in education, skill training, and social reintegration initiatives. Furthermore, the law emphasizes mental health services and the fulfillment of basic rights, creating a more conducive correctional environment. The number of inmates decreased from 3,164 at the end of 2021 to 2,887 in November 2024, effectively addressing the issue of overcrowding. However, several challenges remain to be addressed. Continuous support from the government and society is crucial to achieving rehabilitation goals and reducing recidivism rates. Abstrak Penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi dan implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor. 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan terhadap perubahan sosial warga binaan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Pemuda Kelas IIA Tangerang. Menggunakan metode yuridis empiris, penelitian ini menggabungkan analisis hukum normatif dengan data lapangan melalui studi pustaka, wawancara, dan observasi langsung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 menyederhanakan prosedur remisi dan integrasi dengan menghapus syarat Justice Collaborator (JC), sehingga memberikan kesempatan lebih adil bagi warga binaan untuk mengikuti program rehabilitasi. Hal ini meningkatkan partisipasi dalam pendidikan, pelatihan keterampilan, dan reintegrasi sosial. Selain itu, undang-undang ini menekankan layanan kesehatan mental dan pemenuhan hak dasar, menciptakan lingkungan pemasyarakatan yang lebih kondusif. Jumlah warga binaan menurun dari 3.164 orang pada akhir 2021 menjadi 2.887 orang pada November 2024, mengurangi masalah overkapasitas. Namun, beberapa tantangan masih perlu di atasi, Dukungan berkelanjutan dari pemerintah dan masyarakat sangat diperlukan untuk mencapai tujuan rehabilitasi dan menekan angka residivisme.
Between Individuals and Groups: Normative Ambiguity In Indonesia’s Forestry Partnership Regulation Astrid Amidiaputri Hasyyati; Heppy Hyma Puspytasari; Meita Debi Riyanti
Jurist-Diction Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Volume 9 No. 2, Mei 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v9i2.85332

Abstract

Social Forestry is a strategic program of the Indonesian Government aimed at promoting equitable forest management, as regulated under Government Regulation Number 23 of 2021 on Forestry Administration. One of its implementation schemes is Forestry Partnership, further governed by Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation Number 9 of 2021. Despite its objective of providing legal access for communities to utilize forest areas, the regulation contains normative ambiguity. Article 45 paragraph (3) of the Regulation designates individuals as the subjects of Forestry Partnership approval while simultaneously requiring the formation of groups. This provision is problematic, as the definition of “individuals” under Article 1 point 34 is conceptually distinct from “groups” as defined in Article 1 point 41. This inconsistency has the potential to generate legal uncertainty and administrative obstacles in practical implementation. This study employs normative legal research methods using statutory and conceptual approaches, with normative analysis conducted through extensive interpretation. The findings indicate the need for clearer normative formulation to ensure legal certainty and enhance the effectiveness of Forestry Partnership implementation.