Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Journal Of Legal Sustainability (JOLS)
Yonar Harada Taquas Elta
Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Paradigma Critical Legal Studies Terhadap Asas Legalitas di dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia Yonar Harada Taquas Elta; Yoserwan Yoserwan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1036

Abstract

Hukum pidana di Indonesia erat kaitannya dengan asas legalitas yang terdapat di dalam Pasal 1 ayat (1) KUHP. Asas legalitas di bawah hegemoni paradigma positivisme, menekankan suatu perbuatan dapat dipidana apabila ada aturan hukum yang mengaturnya terlebih dahulu yakni aturan hukum pidana dalam bentuk undang-undang pidana. Jika hanya berorientasi pada undang-undang saja maka keadilan yang diwujudkan hanyalah keadilan formal. Paham critical legal studies menentang dan mengkritik pemahaman tersebut. Fokus sentral critical legal studies adalah untuk mendalami dan menganalisis keberadaan doktrin-doktrin hukum atau asas hukum, termasuk asas legalitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman bahwa paradigma critical legal studies memberikan pandangan yang berbeda terhadap asas legalitas. Metodologi penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan filosofi, perundang-undangan, dan hermeneutik. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, bahwa paham critical legal studies telah masuk di dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia, baik melalui teori hukum maupun melalui undang-undang. Pasal 10 ayat (1) dan Pasal 5 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman merupakan refleksi dari pemahaman critical legal studies. Pasal tersebut memberikan arti yang berbeda mengenai asas legalitas dari apa yang dipahami selama ini serta mengisyaratkan peluang untuk mengisi kelemahan dari asas legalitas status quo.
Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Dan Pemenuhan Hak Dalam Konteks Universalime Dan Relativisme Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia Maya Intan Pratiwi; Syahrial Syahrial; Yonar Harada Taquas Elta
Journal of Legal Sustainability Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni 2026
Publisher : EL-EMIR Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63477/jols.v3i2.527

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the development of human rights enforcement in Indonesia, assess the effectiveness of legal and political commitments in fulfilling human rights, and understand the influence of the concepts of universalism and relativism on human rights enforcement practices in Indonesia. This research uses a normative legal research method with a legislative and conceptual approach. Data were obtained through a literature review of laws and regulations, scientific literature, journals, and human rights-related documents. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively to gain a comprehensive understanding of the issues studied. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that human rights enforcement in Indonesia still faces various challenges. Since independence, human rights have been a complex issue involving the relationship between the state and society. Various legal and political compromises have not fully improved human rights protection effectively. Legal and political commitments also do not guarantee optimal human rights enforcement and often create new problems. Media freedom plays a crucial role in monitoring human rights violations and encouraging law enforcement. Furthermore, the application of human rights in Indonesia is influenced by the concept of relativism, which considers cultural, religious, and social aspects, resulting in differences in implementation. Therefore, international human rights standards need to be more clearly emphasized in national practice.  
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Uang Pengganti Untuk Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru Syahrial Syahrial; Maya Intan Pratiwi; Yonar Harada Taquas Elta
Journal of Legal Sustainability Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni 2026
Publisher : EL-EMIR Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63477/jols.v3i2.528

Abstract

Replacement money is a consequence of the consequences of corruption that can harm the State or state economy, so to restore the loss is necessary juridical means in the form of payment of replacement money. The main problem in this research is how is the mechanism of payment of surrogate money for the return of state losses in the case of corruption crime in Pekanbaru District Court and what are the obstacles faced in the process of payment of replacement money for the return of state loss in the case of corruption in Pekanbaru District Court. The research results show that the mechanism for paying compensation to recoup state losses due to corruption in the Pekanbaru District Court is implemented after a final and binding decision through the confiscation of assets resulting from corruption. Additional penalties in the form of compensation may be imposed in the amount of the assets obtained from the corruption. The Prosecutor's Office implements this through collection, asset auctions, payment of compensation, and civil lawsuits. Obstacles include the difficulty of tracking diverted or spent assets, the inability of convicts to pay, and third-party lawsuits against confiscated assets.
Co-Authors MAYA INTAN PRATIWI Syahrial Syahrial Yoserwan Yoserwan