Ida Ayu Oka Martini
Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Bali, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Impact of Cognitive, Digital, and Psychological Factors on Risky Investment Decisions among Generation Z Investors in Indonesia: The Role of Economic Capability Ni Wayan Dian Irmayani; Nyoman Sri Subawa; Ida Ayu Oka Martini; Luh Putu Mahyuni
Greenation International Journal of Economics and Accounting Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Greenation International Journal of Economics and Accounting (May - June 2026)
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijea.v4i2.1019

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital technology and online investment platforms has significantly increased Generation Z participation in risky investment activities in Indonesia. As digital natives, Generation Z relies heavily on digital information, social media, and financial influencers when making investment decisions. However, investment behavior is influenced not only by knowledge and information but also by psychological and economic factors. This study aims to analyze the effects of financial literacy, digital literacy, perceived trust, financial influencers, psychological bias, and risk attitude on risky investment decisions among Generation Z investors in Indonesia. Furthermore, the study examines the moderating role of economic capability in strengthening the relationships between behavioral factors and risky investment decisions. This research employs a quantitative approach using a survey method. Data were collected through structured questionnaires distributed to Generation Z investors and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling. Using Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM) with data from 275 Generation Z investors across six Indonesian regions, the model explained 63.6% of the variance in risky investment decisions (R² = 0.636; Q² = 0.564; GoF = 0.586). Financial literacy was the only determinant with a significant individual path effect (β = 0.192; p = 0.049). Because the behavioral constructs were highly intercorrelated, the study applied an inferential triangulation strategy combining individual-path testing with block-level hierarchical regression. This revealed that the cognitive-capability block (financial and digital literacy) and the psychological-behavior block (psychological bias and risk attitude) contributed significant incremental variance, whereas perceived trust and financial influencers did not. Economic capability operated as a dominant direct predictor (explaining 53.2% of baseline variance) rather than as a moderator; none of its three moderating effects was significant. The findings indicate that risky investment decisions among Generation Z are driven primarily by internal cognitive and behavioral dispositions operating as an integrated cluster rather than by external social influences, contributing methodological and contextual insights to behavioral finance literature.
The Role Of Digital Culture In Mediating The Influence Of Workload And Management Information Systems On Employee Performance Ratih Indriastuti; Ida Ayu Oka Martini
Amkop Management Accounting Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): July - December
Publisher : Yayasan Vifada Cendikia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37531/amar.v5i2.2976

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of workload on the performance of the work, the influence of management information systems on employee performance, the effect of workload on digital culture, the influence of management information systems on digital culture, the influence of management information systems on employee performance through digital culture, the influence of management information systems on employee performance through digital culture, the influence of digital culture on employee performance. The conclusion of this study is the workload affects employee performance. This means that both the workload felt by employees will affect employee performance behavior. Management information system affects employee performance. This means that both the management information system felt by employees will affect employee performance behavior. Workload affects employee digital culture. This means that both the workload felt by employees will affect the employee's digital culture. The management information system does not affect employee digital culture. This means that the management information system that employees feel by will not affect the employee's digital culture. Digital culture strengthens the effect of workload on employee performance. This means that the existence of digital culture has an impact on increasing employee performance behavior caused by workload. Digital culture does not strengthen the effect of management information systems on employee performance. This means that the existence of digital culture does not have an impact on increasing employee performance behavior caused by management information systems. Digital culture affects employee performance. This means that both digital culture that employees feel by will affect employee performance behavior.