Anas Lutfi
Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Daring (E-Commerce) di Indonesia Aji Andika Mufti; Aris Machmud; Anas Lutfi
Justice Voice Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v5i1.1391

Abstract

Pesatnya perkembangan perdagangan elektronik (e-commerce) di Indonesia telah mengubah lanskap transaksi bisnis dengan menawarkan berbagai kemudahan, sekaligus memunculkan beragam persoalan hukum. Khususnya dalam transaksi Business to Consumer (B2C), posisi konsumen cenderung lebih lemah dibandingkan dengan pelaku usaha. Kondisi tersebut menimbulkan berbagai risiko yang berkaitan dengan mekanisme pembayaran, keamanan transaksi, kesesuaian produk, serta penyelesaian sengketa, mengingat transaksi dilakukan tanpa tatap muka dan sering kali melintasi batas yurisdiksi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kerangka perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dalam transaksi jual beli daring (e-commerce) di Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menelaah berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan, terutama Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Analisis difokuskan pada keabsahan kontrak elektronik, kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti elektronik, kewajiban pelaku usaha dalam menyediakan informasi yang benar, serta jaminan atas hak-hak konsumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia telah memiliki landasan hukum yang mengakui keabsahan transaksi elektronik. Namun demikian, implementasinya masih menghadapi berbagai kendala dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum yang optimal bagi konsumen. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan ekosistem e-commerce yang aman dan tepercaya melalui regulasi yang adaptif serta penyediaan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif dan efisien, seperti Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di luar jalur litigasi konvensional.
Urban Waste Governance in Jakarta: Assessing Institutional Challenges and Policy Implementation Anis Rifai; Zuhad Aji Firmantoro; Amoury Adi Sudiro; Anas Lutfi; M. Isnanda Wendy N
Begawan Abioso Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026): Begawan Abioso
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/abioso.v17i1.1505

Abstract

Waste management failure in Jakarta is not merely a technical or environmental issue; rather, it reflects fundamental deficiencies in the regulatory framework, which has failed to generate efficient economic incentives, internalize environmental externalities, and operationalize circular economy mechanisms. Employing a socio-legal research methodology combined with a normative-economic approach, this study finds that Indonesia’s waste management regime remains predominantly governed by a command-and-control model, which has proven ineffective in influencing the economic behaviour of producers, consumers, and local governments. Structural deficiencies—including the absence of a robust Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework, excessive transaction costs arising from institutional fragmentation, the inability of existing pricing structures to reflect the marginal cost of waste disposal, and the systematic exclusion of the informal waste sector—have collectively produced a governance architecture that is economically inefficient and socially inequitable. This study aims to identify and analyse the role of Economic Analysis of Law (EAL) in enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of waste management legislation in Jakarta and to formulate an appropriate regulatory model for urban waste governance. The findings demonstrate that EAL provides a robust analytical framework for diagnosing regulatory failures and evaluating institutional inefficiencies. The study argues that reconstructing Indonesia’s waste management regulatory framework requires a transition from a predominantly punitive command-and-control approach to a comprehensive incentive-compatible regulatory system. Such reform carries significant implications for legislative development and supports the realization of the constitutional right to a good and healthy environment as guaranteed under Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Accordingly, the proposed regulatory model should adapt international best practices to Indonesia’s institutional context, thereby aligning economic incentives with environmental sustainability and social inclusion.