Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Typology of the Influence of Qirāʾāt Variations on the Interpretation and Istinbāṭ of Islamic Law: Linguistic and Juridical Analysis of Aḥkām Verses Saifullah
Dialogia Vol. 24 No. 01 (2026): DIALOGIA: JURNAL STUDI ISLAM DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Ushuluddin, Adab, and Dakwah Faculty of State Islamic University Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/dialogia.v24i01.13899

Abstract

Studies of qirāʾāt (variant Qur’anic readings) typically focus on the authenticity of oral transmission, which often results in a fragmented examination of their impact on the development of Islamic law. To address this, the current study develops a comprehensive analytical framework that classifies how variations in qirāʾāt influence exegesis (Qur’anic interpretation) and legal deduction (istinbāṭ) in legal verses (ayāt aḥkām). Employing a library research method with an integrative approach, the study encompasses Arabic linguistics—morphology (ṣarf), syntax (naḥw), semantics (dalālah), phonology (ṣawt)—as well as legal methodology (usul al-fiqh). The data is analyzed comprehensively and typologically through the integration of the theory of resolving conflicts of evidence (taʿāruḍ al-adillah). The findings identify four systematic typological models for the influence of recitation variations on legal construction: (1) the Cumulative-Complementary typology, which unites complementary dimensions of meaning without altering the substance of the law; (2) the Conditional-Qualitative typology, which sets strict conditions for legal implementation via changes in verb patterns; (3) the Differentiative-Alternative typology, where shifts in iʿrāb (grammatical case) diacritics polarize schools of thought yet offer alternative legal pathways; and (4) the Categorical-Conceptual typology, which underlies debates in ushūl al-fiqh concerning the boundaries of literal and figurative meaning. Epistemologically, these findings confirm that the plurality of Islamic law (ikhtilāf al-fuqahāʾ) has a valid textual-linguistic foundation inherent in the very structure of revelation. This foundational plurality reflects the flexibility of sharia (Islamic law).
Between Machines and the Tafsīr Tradition: Reorienting Tafsīr bi al-Ma’ṡūr in the Age of Computational Interpretation Saifullah; Soleh Hasan Wahid; Muhammad Ihza Fazrian
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7499

Abstract

This study examines authority and attribution in Qur’anic interpretation mediated by artificial intelligence. The phrase fī sabīlillāh in Q 9:60 serves as a test case because its meaning has been disputed since the earliest period, its transmission is layered, and its implications extend to zakat distribution. The same interpretive question was submitted to seven mainstream language models and assessed through tafsīr bi al-ma’ṡūr, understood as an evaluative hermeneutic centered on traceable attribution, isnād, tarjīḥ, and fidelity to sources. Interpretations by al-Ṭabarī, al-Qurṭubī, and Ibn Kaṡīr provided the basis for an analytic rubric. Two raters independently evaluated 28 model responses and reconciled their judgments through consensus, producing 248 audited error findings. Although the models generally identified the three exegetes and their works, they performed poorly in preserving isnād, narration structure, citation accuracy, and attribution. Unsupported additions and shifts of meaning dominated the errors. Higher-performing models produced more polished answers but did not eliminate source-level failures. The findings indicate that greater model capacity alone cannot secure credible machine-mediated tafsir; verification must restore the attributional discipline of tafsīr bi al-ma’ṡūr.
Prinsip Amanah Dalam Pengisian Jabatan Publik Dan Penggunaan Kewenangan Negara: Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Islam Dalam Tafsir Al-Manār Saifullah; Lilia Prasastiningtiyas
El-Dusturie Vol 5 No 2: (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Islam Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/eldusturie.v5i2.14655

Abstract

Abstract: The concept of amānah has traditionally been examined primarily as a form of personal ethics for leaders rather than as a legal norm that can be operationalized within the state administrative system. This study aims to formulate amānah as a legal principle of good governance based on al-Manār’s interpretation of QS al-Nisā’ [4]:58–59. This normative legal research employs a conceptual approach and a contextual exegetical approach by analyzing the text of Tafsīr al-Manār descriptively and interpretively, and subsequently reconstructing its principles prescriptively into categories of administrative law encompassing official competence, legally bound authority, and oversight. The primary legal material, Tafsīr al-Manār, is examined in dialogue with constitutional and administrative law literature and contemporary principles of good governance. The findings demonstrate that al-Manār constructs six elements of amānah: public mandate, competence, justice in the exercise of authority, participation, conditional obedience, and oversight, which correspond to the merit system and the principle of due care in administrative law. This finding offers a practical contribution in the form of an ethical-normative framework that can enrich the formulation of public office codes of ethics and performance evaluation indicators for public officials based on the value of amānah.Keywords: Amānah; Good Governance; Administrative Law; Tafsīr Al-Manār; Accountability. Abstrak: Konsep amanah selama ini lebih banyak dikaji sebagai etika personal pemimpin, bukan sebagai norma hukum yang dapat dioperasionalkan dalam sistem administrasi negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan merumuskan amanah sebagai prinsip hukum tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik (good governance) berdasarkan penafsiran al-Manār atas QS al-Nisā' [4]:58–59. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan tafsir kontekstual, dengan menganalisis teks Tafsir al-Manār secara deskriptif-interpretatif, kemudian merekonstruksinya secara preskriptif ke dalam kategori hukum administrasi negara yang meliputi kompetensi jabatan, kewenangan terikat, dan pengawasan. Bahan hukum primer berupa Tafsir al-Manār dikonfrontasikan dengan literatur hukum tata negara dan prinsip-prinsip good governance kontemporer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa al-Manār mengonstruksi enam elemen Amanah yakni mandat publik, kompetensi, keadilan kewenangan, partisipasi, ketaatan bersyarat, dan pengawasan yang paralel dengan asas merit system dan asas kecermatan dalam hukum administrasi negara. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi praktis berupa kerangka etik-normatif yang dapat memperkaya penyusunan kode etik jabatan publik dan indikator evaluasi kinerja pejabat berbasis nilai amanah. Kata Kunci: Amanah; Good Governance; Hukum Administrasi Negara; Tafsir Al-Manār; Akuntabilitas