Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Dialogia: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial
Saifullah
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo
Religion Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Typology of the Influence of Qirāʾāt Variations on the Interpretation and Istinbāṭ of Islamic Law: Linguistic and Juridical Analysis of Aḥkām Verses Saifullah
Dialogia Vol. 24 No. 01 (2026): DIALOGIA: JURNAL STUDI ISLAM DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Ushuluddin, Adab, and Dakwah Faculty of State Islamic University Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/dialogia.v24i01.13899

Abstract

Studies of qirāʾāt (variant Qur’anic readings) typically focus on the authenticity of oral transmission, which often results in a fragmented examination of their impact on the development of Islamic law. To address this, the current study develops a comprehensive analytical framework that classifies how variations in qirāʾāt influence exegesis (Qur’anic interpretation) and legal deduction (istinbāṭ) in legal verses (ayāt aḥkām). Employing a library research method with an integrative approach, the study encompasses Arabic linguistics—morphology (ṣarf), syntax (naḥw), semantics (dalālah), phonology (ṣawt)—as well as legal methodology (usul al-fiqh). The data is analyzed comprehensively and typologically through the integration of the theory of resolving conflicts of evidence (taʿāruḍ al-adillah). The findings identify four systematic typological models for the influence of recitation variations on legal construction: (1) the Cumulative-Complementary typology, which unites complementary dimensions of meaning without altering the substance of the law; (2) the Conditional-Qualitative typology, which sets strict conditions for legal implementation via changes in verb patterns; (3) the Differentiative-Alternative typology, where shifts in iʿrāb (grammatical case) diacritics polarize schools of thought yet offer alternative legal pathways; and (4) the Categorical-Conceptual typology, which underlies debates in ushūl al-fiqh concerning the boundaries of literal and figurative meaning. Epistemologically, these findings confirm that the plurality of Islamic law (ikhtilāf al-fuqahāʾ) has a valid textual-linguistic foundation inherent in the very structure of revelation. This foundational plurality reflects the flexibility of sharia (Islamic law).
Between Machines and the Tafsīr Tradition: Reorienting Tafsīr bi al-Ma’ṡūr in the Age of Computational Interpretation Saifullah; Soleh Hasan Wahid; Muhammad Ihza Fazrian
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7499

Abstract

This study examines authority and attribution in Qur’anic interpretation mediated by artificial intelligence. The phrase fī sabīlillāh in Q 9:60 serves as a test case because its meaning has been disputed since the earliest period, its transmission is layered, and its implications extend to zakat distribution. The same interpretive question was submitted to seven mainstream language models and assessed through tafsīr bi al-ma’ṡūr, understood as an evaluative hermeneutic centered on traceable attribution, isnād, tarjīḥ, and fidelity to sources. Interpretations by al-Ṭabarī, al-Qurṭubī, and Ibn Kaṡīr provided the basis for an analytic rubric. Two raters independently evaluated 28 model responses and reconciled their judgments through consensus, producing 248 audited error findings. Although the models generally identified the three exegetes and their works, they performed poorly in preserving isnād, narration structure, citation accuracy, and attribution. Unsupported additions and shifts of meaning dominated the errors. Higher-performing models produced more polished answers but did not eliminate source-level failures. The findings indicate that greater model capacity alone cannot secure credible machine-mediated tafsir; verification must restore the attributional discipline of tafsīr bi al-ma’ṡūr.
Co-Authors Muhammad Ihza Fazrian Soleh Hasan Wahid