Muhammad Ardiansyah
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kalimat Imperatif (Amr) dalam Al-Qur’an: Perspektif Balagah dan Implikasinya dalam Penafsiran Muhammad Ardiansyah; Mohamad Harjum; Dudung Abdullah
Dirosah Islamiyah Vol 1 No 3 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Dirosah Islamiyah: Jurnal Studi Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines imperative sentences (amr) in the Qur’an with a focus on their forms, meanings, and the role of context in interpretation. This topic is important because imperative expressions in the Qur’an do not always indicate obligatory commands, but may convey various meanings depending on the context in which they appear. The study aims to analyze the forms of amr in the Qur’an, identify their functions and meanings from the perspective of balāgah, and explain the role of context in determining the meaning of imperative expressions. This research employs a qualitative-descriptive library research method. The data were collected from Qur’anic verses, classical books of balāgah, tafsir literature, uṣūl fiqh references, and relevant scholarly articles. The analysis uses the balāgah approach, particularly the science of ma‘ānī, by considering siyāq al-kalām and contextual indicators (qarīnah) accompanying the verses. The findings reveal that amr in the Qur’an appears in several forms, including fi‘il amr, fi‘il mudhāri‘ accompanied by lām al-amr, isim fi‘il amr, masdar functioning as fi‘il amr, and expressions containing imperative meanings. Furthermore, amr carries various semantic functions such as ibāḥah, takhyīr, tahdīd, ta‘jīz, du‘ā, iltimās, naṣīḥah, ikrām, imtinān, taḥqīr, and takwīn. This study concludes that context plays a crucial role in determining the meaning of imperative expressions in Qur’anic interpretation and contributes to a deeper understanding of Qur’anic rhetoric and interpretation
Tuwa’ Pai, Abotoreng, Na Barahala Dalam Penafsiran QS Al-Mā’idah Ayat 90: Studi Komparatif AGH. Daud Ismail dan AGH. Abd. Muin Yusuf Ahmad Iddal; Achmad Abubakar; Muhsin Mahfudz; Muhammad Ardiansyah
Dirosah Islamiyah Vol 1 No 3 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Dirosah Islamiyah: Jurnal Studi Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines a comparative interpretation of Qur'an Surah Al-Mā'idah verse 90 in the exegeses of AGH. Daud Ismail and AGH. Abd. Muin Yusuf. The study aims to identify the similarities and differences in the interpretive methods and exegetical approaches employed by the two mufassirs in explaining this verse. This research adopts a qualitative library research method using a comparative (muqāran) approach to Qur'anic exegesis. The findings reveal that AGH. Daud Ismail emphasizes a culturally oriented da'wah approach, employing language that is closely connected to the Bugis community, whereas AGH. Abd. Muin Yusuf presents a more systematic and rational explanation of the verse's content. Despite differences in their interpretive methods and styles, both mufassirs consistently affirm the prohibition of intoxicants (khamr), gambling, idol worship, and divination by arrows (al-azlām). This study demonstrates that local Qur'anic exegesis plays a significant role in bringing the message of the Qur'an closer to society by adapting it to local cultural and social contexts.