Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Inovasi Daging dari Jantung Pisang untuk Mendukung Katering Bagi Kaum Vegan Muhammad Taqiyuddin Hilali; M Iqbal Najib Fahmi; Muhamad Justitia Ramadhan; Natasya Adiba Zahrah; Sinta Kharomah; Nindiana Choirunisa'; Ika Sulistyowati; Siti Zubaidah
Jurnal Medika: Medika Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/fcm07x02

Abstract

Tren gaya hidup vegan dan vegetarian semakin meningkat dan mendorong pergeseran pola konsumsi masyarakat dari pangan hewani ke pangan berbasis nabati. Kondisi ini menciptakan permintaan pasar yang terus tumbuh untuk produk inovatif non-hewani. Salah satu sumber daya lokal yang berpotensi dikembangkan adalah jantung pisang. Bahan ini memiliki kandungan protein dan serat tinggi, sehingga cocok dimanfaatkan sebagai bahan dasar pembuatan daging nabati. Selain memiliki nilai gizi, jantung pisang juga bernilai ekonomi apabila diolah secara kreatif. Namun, masyarakat umumnya masih minim pengetahuan mengenai pengolahan jantung pisang menjadi produk bernilai jual. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, program pelatihan dilaksanakan dengan pendekatan Asset Based Community Development (ABCD) di Kampung Sanan, Malang, Jawa Timur. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan respons positif, peserta merasa puas, menilai pelatihan bermanfaat, penyampaian jelas, menarik, serta menumbuhkan minat untuk berwirausaha. Dengan demikian, kegiatan ini memberikan manfaat nyata sekaligus membuka peluang usaha berbasis produk nabati.
Scientific Argumentation Abilities among Undergraduate Biology Students: An Analysis Using the Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) Framework Muhamad Justitia Ramadhan; Siti Zubaidah; Munzil Munzil
Jurnal Paedagogy Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/jp.v13i1.18465

Abstract

This study aims to examine the level of scientific argumentation skills among biology students using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) framework. The research employed a quantitative descriptive method using essay questions designed to elicit key components of scientific argumentation. The participants consisted of 82 undergraduate students enrolled in a Genetics course during the even semester of the 2025 academic year. Data were collected through an essay test developed based on Genetics-related topics. Data analysis focused on the presence of TAP components and the classification of students’ levels of scientific argumentation. The results reveal that students’ scientific argumentation skills remain low, with 47.56% of students categorized at Level 1 and 30.5% at Level 2. Analysis of TAP component distribution indicates that 91.46% of students were able to state claims; however, these claims were predominantly unsupported by warrants or reasoning that meaningfully connected the evidence to the conclusions. The low levels of scientific argumentation observed reflect limitations in students’ critical thinking and scientific reasoning skills. Therefore, the implementation of instructional models such as Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Project-Based Learning (PjBL), and TAP-guided formative assessment strategies is recommended to enhance students’ scientific argumentation abilities.