Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Concept of Justice in Wage Determination in the Perspective of Maqasid Sharia: Ibn Taimiyyah's Perspective Alfan Jawahir Muhammad; Hilali Basya; Fina Nurafni
Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA) Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA)
Publisher : CV Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/jcpa.1639

Abstract

This study aims to describe the concept of justice in wage determination according to Ibn Taimiyyah, viewed through the lens of Maqasid Sharia. This topic is important because in current reality, many institutions fail to pay sufficient attention to the fairness of workers' wages. As a result, wages received are often not proportional to the effort expended nor adequate to meet basic needs. According to Islamic principles, wages should be fair reflecting the worker's contribution and sufficient to cover daily necessities. Ibn Taimiyyah is one of the scholars who emphasizes justice as a core value of Maqasid Sharia and promotes the theory of al-ujrah al-mithliyyah, which bases wage determination on prevailing market rates. This research employs a qualitative, library-based method, using secondary data from various literature sources, and analyzed through descriptive-analytical techniques. The study finds that: (1)Fair wages, according to Ibn Taimiyyah, are those aligned with market standards, combining justice and feasibility; (2)His views are consistent with the objectives of Maqasid Sharia, particularly in realizing justice (tahqiq al-‘adl), protecting life (hifz al-nafs), and promoting equitable wealth distribution (maqasid furu’iyah). These insights offer a valuable perspective on how Islamic teachings can guide ethical labor practices today.
The Implementation of Qawāʿid Fiqhiyyah in Islamic Securities Crowdfunding Alfan Jawahir Muhammad; Zainal Arif; fina Nurafni
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 01: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i01.10289

Abstract

Islamic Securities Crowdfunding (ISC) is an innovation in Islamic finance that offers an alternative funding mechanism in accordance with Sharia principles. As financial technology continues to develop, ISC enables the public to participate in investment activities in a more inclusive and transparent manner. However, its implementation must consistently adhere to the principles of qawāʿid fiqhiyyah (Islamic legal maxims) to avoid elements of riba (usury), gharar (uncertainty), and maysir (gambling). This study examines the application of qawāʿid fiqhiyyah in Islamic Securities Crowdfunding by referring to DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 140/DSN-MUI/VIII/2021. It analyzes several Islamic legal maxims, including the permissibility of commercial transactions unless explicitly prohibited, the principle of preventing harm, and the relationship between legal rulings and their effective causes (ʿillah). Using a literature review method and a descriptive-analytical approach, this research explores how ISC can be implemented in accordance with Indonesia's Islamic financial regulations. The findings indicate that ISC has significant potential to enhance Islamic financial inclusion while upholding the principles of transparency, justice, and public welfare (maṣlaḥah). The application of qawāʿid fiqhiyyah in ISC ensures that every transaction complies with Islamic law, making it a sustainable investment solution that aligns with the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah).
Kepatuhan Syariah pada Akad Musyarakah Mutanaqishah di Bank Syariah di Indonesia Setiawan Bin Lahuri; Fina Nurafni; Alya Zhafirah Nasywa
SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/sosmaniora.v4i4.6217

Abstract

Musyarakah Mutanaqishah (MMQ) is a form of hybrid contract and an alternative Sharia-compliant financing model for asset and home ownership. Despite its advantages such as shared ownership, profit sharing, rental cost flexibility, and resilience against economic volatility its implementation in Indonesia remains limited. This is due to low public awareness, and legal and operational challenges. This study aims to explore the strengths of MMQ and evaluate its compliance with Sharia principles, particularly within the framework of hybrid contracts. Employing a qualitative descriptive method through library research that includes books, journals, and scholarly articles, this research finds that MMQ aligns with Sharia law. It combines three permissible contracts: musyarakah (partnership), ijarah (leasing), and ba’i (sale). MMQ also adheres to the boundaries set for hybrid contracts, such as avoiding riba, legal contradictions, and prohibited objectives. Consequently, MMQ is considered a legitimate and Sharia-compliant financing structure. The study recommends the broader application and development of MMQ as a fair and sustainable alternative for Islamic financing in the Indonesian banking sector.
The Practice of Equal Inheritance Distribution in Karangbanyu Village, Ngawi Setiawan Bin Lahuri; Fina Nurafni; Alfan Jawahir Muhammad
Alhurriyah Vol 10 No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/al-hurriyah.v10i02.9984

Abstract

This study explores the practice of inheritance distribution between men and women, where the majority of the community applies an equal 1:1 division rather than the 2:1 ratio prescribed in Islamic inheritance law. While the Qur’an establishes the 2:1 distribution as just and beneficial (maṣlaḥah), reflecting the distinct rights and responsibilities of men and women, the community interprets justice as equal shares. Factors influencing this practice include customary traditions, parental instructions, the desire to avoid family disputes, the longer caregiving role often carried out by daughters, and the perception that all children deserve equal rights. This research uses a qualitative juridical-sociological approach, drawing data from interviews, documentation, and supporting literature. The findings indicate that the 1:1 practice is viewed locally as fair and beneficial because it prevents conflict, maintains family harmony, and ensures individual ownership of assets. However, from the perspective of Islamic law, true maṣlaḥah lies in the 2:1 provision, which balances men’s financial duties with women’s honored but non-financial roles. The study highlights the tension between local customs and Islamic legal principles, suggesting the need for broader awareness and dialogue to align community practices with the objectives of the Sharī‘ah