Abd. Haris Nasution
Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Effectiveness of Interactive E-Modules in Evaluating OBE-Based History Learning through a Collaborative Team Project Approach Arfan Diansyah; Yushar Tanjung; Syahrul Nizar Saragih; Abd. Haris Nasution
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v5i3.4037

Abstract

This study seeks to examine both the effectiveness and the practicality of an interactive e-module developed for the History Learning Evaluation course, which is grounded in the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) framework and employs a Team-Based Project approach. This development research follows the ADDIE model, consisting of five key phases: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The research procedure began with a preliminary study and needs analysis, followed by the design of an e-module prototype. This prototype was then validated by subject-matter and media experts, trialed with students, and assessed for effectiveness through learning outcome tests. Data were gathered using questionnaires and tests, with subsequent analysis performed using descriptive quantitative methods. The results revealed that the interactive e-module attained a feasibility rating of 77% from material experts and 72% from media experts, both of which fall within the "feasible" category. In terms of effectiveness, the trial demonstrated a clear improvement in student performance, as evidenced by an increase in the average score from 63.13 on the pre-test to 79.46 on the post-test. Based on the predefined effectiveness criteria, the OBE-based interactive e-module with a Team-Based Project approach was officially deemed effective at enhancing student learning outcomes. In conclusion, this interactive e-module is considered both appropriate and effective for use as supplementary instructional material in the History Learning Evaluation course.
Continuity of Agrarian Domination in Deli Serdang from Colonialism to Reform Tappil Rambe; Panji Suroso; Jude Chikadibia Onwunyirimadu; Hidayat Hidayat; Abd. Haris Nasution; Lanang Riyadi
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2647

Abstract

Persistent agrarian inequality in Indonesia reveals a critical gap in explaining how colonial legal and economic logics survive political regime change. This study examines how legal and institutional mechanisms reproduced and adapted agrarian domination in Ramunia Plantation, Deli Serdang, from the colonial period through the Reform Era. Using a critical-historical qualitative design, the study analyzed colonial archives, agrarian regulations, and institutional records alongside in-depth interviews with 30 informants and 40 field observation sessions. Data were interpreted through historical source criticism, thematic analysis, and triangulation. The findings demonstrate that political transitions changed the formal actors and instruments of control but did not dismantle underlying agrarian relations. Colonial concessions were reconfigured through nationalization, State Control Rights, HGU-based management, state–military–corporate networks, administrative fragmentation, and infrastructure-driven land acquisition. These adaptations left historical occupation, customary claims, and actual land use unresolved while privileging actors with stronger administrative and political resources. The study advances the continuum-of-domination proposition to explain that agrarian domination persists not through institutional immobility, but through the translation of inherited governing logics into new legal and administrative forms. Agrarian justice, therefore, requires conflict resolution that integrates documentary genealogy, historical land relations, actual land use, and differentiated community claims rather than relying exclusively on formal titles.