Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hak Nafkah Anak Melalui Trust Fund Keluarga Pasca-Perceraian: Model Perjanjian dan Aspek Legalitasnya di Indonesia : Penelitian Zeni Sunarti; Rema syelvita; Rifqi Pratama Putra
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 1 February - May 2
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i1.409

Abstract

Pasca-perceraian, pemenuhan hak nafkah anak sering kali mengalami kendala eksekusi akibat ketiadaan mekanisme jaminan yang rigid dalam sistem hukum perdata Indonesia. Meskipun pengadilan telah menjatuhkan putusan batasan nominal nafkah, dalam praktiknya mantan suami selaku ayah sering kali melalaikan kewajiban tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis aspek legalitas penerapan Trust Fund (Dana Amanat) dalam sistem hukum Civil Law di Indonesia serta merumuskan karakteristik model perjanjian trust fund keluarga yang ideal sebagai solusi preventif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Indonesia tidak mengenal doktrin dual ownership sebagaimana negara Common Law, konsep Trust Fund dapat diakomodasi melalui rekayasa hukum (legal engineering) berbasis Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak (Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata) dan pemanfaatan rekening bersyarat (escrow account atau layanan trustee perbankan). Model perjanjian yang dirancang bersifat tripartit (irrevocable trust contract) yang dituangkan dalam akta notaris dan diintegrasikan ke dalam amar putusan pengadilan guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak kelangsungan hidup anak secara otomatis.
Reorienting the Economic Rights of Creators: A Constitutional Analysis of Copyright Licensing Post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 28/PUU-XXIII/2025 Rifqi Pratama Putra; Dwi Suryahartati; Zeni Sunarti
Rechtsvinding Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1346

Abstract

This research examines the implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 28/PUU-XXIII/2025 on digital copyright licensing in Indonesia. The study addresses the anomaly where rapid creative industry growth fails to enhance creator welfare due to exploitative "direct licensing" mechanisms in Article 40 of Law No. 28 of 2014. This provision is deemed to violate constitutional property rights by allowing digital platforms to exploit works without explicit consent. Using normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes primary and secondary legal materials. The results reveal that Decision No. 28/PUU-XXIII/2025 serves as a constitutional correction, prioritizing substantive justice over industrial efficiency. The ruling strengthens creators' bargaining positions, mandates transparency in royalty systems, and triggers a paradigm shift from efficiency-oriented to justice-oriented licensing. Practical implications include the mandatory renegotiation of licensing contracts, the integration of digital technologies like blockchain within the National Collective Management Organization (LMKN), and the realignment of global platform business models. Ultimately, this decision establishes a robust legal foundation to ensure equitable economic rights protection within Indonesia's digital ecosystem.
Implementation of An-Taradhin and Ghabn Principles in Food and Beverage Pricing within Elementary School Environments Sanjani; Haeran; Erwina Kartika Devi; Daud; Zeni Sunarti; Sayida Khoiratun Nisak
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 4 Oktober 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i4.1568

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of 'an taradhin (mutual consent) and ghabn (unfair price disparity) principles in food and beverage pricing practices within the elementary school canteen environment from the perspective of Islamic Economic Law. The study was conducted at SD Negeri 61/X Talang Babat, Muara Sabak Barat District, East Tanjung Jabung Regency, Jambi, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical field research design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observations, and document analysis involving school authorities, canteen vendors, and student consumers. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing, supported by source and methodological triangulation. The findings demonstrate that price determination is primarily based on purchase costs, operational expenses, expected profit, market conditions, and students’ purchasing power. Vendors tend to maintain affordable prices despite increases in input costs, indicating an orientation toward consumer welfare and maslahah. The principle of 'an taradhin is substantively reflected in the acceptance of prices by buyers and sellers, while no evidence of deliberate price manipulation or excessive exploitation was identified. However, the absence of formal written pricing standards creates an institutional gap in transparency and consumer protection. The implementation of the Free Nutritious Meal (MBG) Program and fluctuations in input prices further intensify the tension between affordability and vendor sustainability. The study concludes that school-canteen pricing practices are substantively compatible with Islamic Economic Law but require stronger institutional governance through transparent pricing guidelines, monitoring, and participatory oversight