Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Erham Erham
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, NTB, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Resolving Jurisdictional Disputes Between the Central Executive Board of Political Parties and DPRD Factions in Regional Policymaking: A Constitutional Law and Democratic Governance Perspective Muhsin Yusuf; Taufik Firmanto; Erham Erham
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v8i2.13619

Abstract

Ideally, the relationship between the Central Executive Board (Dewan Pimpinan Pusat—DPP) of political parties and regional legislative factions (Fraksi DPRD) should be structured proportionally based on the principles of the rule of law, popular sovereignty, and constitutional democracy, thereby ensuring that party discipline operates in harmony with the institutional independence of legislative factions in exercising their legislative, budgeting, and oversight functions. In practice, however, the boundaries of authority between these institutions remain ambiguous, resulting in recurring jurisdictional disputes over regional policymaking that have not been comprehensively regulated under Indonesian positive law. This study aims to examine the constitutional and legal position of the DPP and DPRD factions, analyze the dynamics of jurisdictional disputes between them, and formulate an appropriate dispute resolution model from the perspective of constitutional democracy. This research employs normative legal research with a qualitative approach using the statute, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were analyzed prescriptively through statutory interpretation, legal doctrines, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings reveal that jurisdictional disputes primarily arise from the overlap between the organizational authority of political parties and the public authority vested in DPRD factions. The proposed model emphasizes a coordinative institutional relationship, normative limitations on DPP intervention, strengthened internal party dispute resolution mechanisms, regulatory reform, and judicial safeguards to balance party discipline, factional independence, and the constitutional mandate of the people.
Sifat Final dan Mengikat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pemberhentian Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden di Indonesia Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Azhari Azhari; Erham Erham; Hajairin Hajairin
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i4.8435

Abstract

Sifat Final dan Mengikat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pemberhentian Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden di Indonesia Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Dalam Objek Riset; Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dalam memberikan pendapat hukum atas usul DPR mengenai dugaan pelanggaran hukum oleh Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden berdasarkan Pasal 7B UUD NRI 1945. Dengan tujuan menganalisis konstruksi normatif sifat final dan mengikat putusan MK dalam proses impeachment serta implikasinya terhadap kepastian hukum jika terjadi ketidakselarasan dengan keputusan politik MPR. Menggunakan Metode: Penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, perbandingan, dan historis. Data dianalisis secara kualitatif menggunakan teori kepastian hukum dan konstitusionalisme. Hasil: Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meski putusan MK secara umum bersifat final dan mengikat, dalam konteks pemberhentian Presiden, putusan tersebut hanya bersifat pendapat hukum (advisory opinion). Hal ini menimbulkan ambiguitas konstitusional dan kekosongan norma terkait kewajiban MPR untuk mematuhinya. Perbandingan internasional menunjukkan perlunya mekanisme judicial review yang mengikat mutlak demi stabilitas demokrasi. Disimpulkan bahwa diperlukan reformasi legislatif untuk menegaskan sifat mengikat mutlak pendapat MK terhadap MPR guna menjamin kepastian hukum dalam sistem presidensial Indonesia.
Co-Authors Azhari Azhari Hajairin Muhsin Yusuf Taufik Firmanto