Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Taufiq Alamsyah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Role of General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) in Administrative Court Dispute Resolution Annura Nazwa; Azmi Fauziah Suanda; Dewi Mayang; Yoga Ammar Arifin; Taufiq Alamsyah
Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): June: Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/n5ya1f90

Abstract

This study examines the role of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) in the resolution of administrative court disputes in Indonesia through a normative legal research approach based on statutory, conceptual, and case analyses. The research analyzes administrative court decisions issued between 2020 and 2023 together with relevant legislation governing administrative justice and government administration. The findings indicate that AUPB has evolved from a complementary interpretative standard into a substantive judicial benchmark for assessing the legality and legitimacy of administrative actions. Judicial application demonstrates that governance principles are utilized across diverse categories of disputes, including licensing, land administration, environmental governance, public information, taxation, procurement, and civil service matters, with varying review orientations reflecting the characteristics of each dispute. The study also reveals regional variations in judicial interpretation and application, producing differences in decision consistency, legal certainty, executorial effectiveness, and public trust. Despite these variations, explicit reliance on AUPB strengthens judicial reasoning, enhances administrative accountability, and promotes more responsive administrative justice. The research concludes that AUPB functions as a central normative instrument for improving adjudicative quality and reinforcing good governance within Indonesia’s administrative law system.
A Legal Analysis of the Application of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) as the Basis for Judicial Decision-Making in the Resolution of Administrative Law Disputes Naufal Hibatul Wafi; Raisa Agnia; Windi Putri Oktapiani; Muhamad Syamsul Maarif; M.Z Syafiq Haidar; Taufiq Alamsyah
Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): June: Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/mjcysa42

Abstract

This study examines the legal position, judicial application, and future development of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) as a basis for judicial decision making in the resolution of administrative law disputes in Indonesia. Employing a non empirical normative juridical method, the research analyzes constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, administrative law doctrines, and administrative court decisions to evaluate the interaction between legal norms and judicial interpretation. The findings indicate that AUPB has evolved into a significant normative standard within Indonesian administrative law, functioning not only as a complementary legal principle but also as an independent benchmark for reviewing administrative actions and decisions. Judicial practice demonstrates that AUPB serves as an instrument for assessing legality, controlling abuse of authority, guiding the exercise of discretion, and balancing legal certainty with substantive justice. The study also identifies challenges arising from interpretive variation, regulatory fragmentation, and differing judicial approaches to principle based adjudication. Strengthening doctrinal coherence, judicial capacity, and regulatory harmonization is essential for enhancing consistency in administrative adjudication. The research concludes that AUPB plays a central role in reinforcing administrative justice, governmental accountability, and the realization of good governance within the contemporary legal system.  
A Legal Analysis of The Bandung Administrative Court Decision No. 180/G/2024/Ptun.Bdg Regarding A Dispute Over The Transfer of Civil Servants from The Perspective of The General Principles of Good Governance Faza Pauzia Hermawan; Ifqi Maula Manaz; Sanabila Khairil Ahya; Siti Maharani; Taufiq Alamsyah
Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): June: Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/ha6jbq86

Abstract

This study examines the legality of Bandung Administrative Court Decision Number 180/G/2024/PTUN.BDG concerning a dispute over the transfer of a civil servant position through the perspective of the General Principles of Good Governance. The research employed a non empirical normative juridical approach based on statutory analysis, case analysis, and conceptual analysis. Primary sources consisted of the court decision and relevant Indonesian administrative law regulations governing state administrative justice, government administration, and the state civil apparatus. The findings indicate that the disputed transfer decision was issued by a competent authority but contained significant procedural and substantive defects. The court identified the use of an expired technical recommendation, administrative error, insufficient objective justification, and non compliance with merit based personnel management standards. These deficiencies resulted in violations of legal certainty and due care principles that form essential components of good governance. The analysis further demonstrates that the General Principles of Good Governance function as substantive standards for reviewing administrative discretion beyond formal legality. The decision strengthens judicial oversight, promotes bureaucratic accountability, reinforces merit system implementation, and contributes to the development of governance oriented administrative law in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Annura Nazwa Azmi Fauziah Suanda Dewi Mayang Faza Pauzia Hermawan Ifqi Maula Manaz M.Z Syafiq Haidar Muhamad Syamsul Maarif Naufal Hibatul Wafi Raisa Agnia Sanabila Khairil Ahya Siti Maharani Windi Putri Oktapiani Yoga Ammar Arifin