Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

The Role of General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) in Administrative Court Dispute Resolution Annura Nazwa; Azmi Fauziah Suanda; Dewi Mayang; Yoga Ammar Arifin; Taufiq Alamsyah
Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): June: Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/n5ya1f90

Abstract

This study examines the role of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) in the resolution of administrative court disputes in Indonesia through a normative legal research approach based on statutory, conceptual, and case analyses. The research analyzes administrative court decisions issued between 2020 and 2023 together with relevant legislation governing administrative justice and government administration. The findings indicate that AUPB has evolved from a complementary interpretative standard into a substantive judicial benchmark for assessing the legality and legitimacy of administrative actions. Judicial application demonstrates that governance principles are utilized across diverse categories of disputes, including licensing, land administration, environmental governance, public information, taxation, procurement, and civil service matters, with varying review orientations reflecting the characteristics of each dispute. The study also reveals regional variations in judicial interpretation and application, producing differences in decision consistency, legal certainty, executorial effectiveness, and public trust. Despite these variations, explicit reliance on AUPB strengthens judicial reasoning, enhances administrative accountability, and promotes more responsive administrative justice. The research concludes that AUPB functions as a central normative instrument for improving adjudicative quality and reinforcing good governance within Indonesia’s administrative law system.
A Legal Analysis of the Application of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) as the Basis for Judicial Decision-Making in the Resolution of Administrative Law Disputes Naufal Hibatul Wafi; Raisa Agnia; Windi Putri Oktapiani; Muhamad Syamsul Maarif; M.Z Syafiq Haidar; Taufiq Alamsyah
Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): June: Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/mjcysa42

Abstract

This study examines the legal position, judicial application, and future development of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) as a basis for judicial decision making in the resolution of administrative law disputes in Indonesia. Employing a non empirical normative juridical method, the research analyzes constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, administrative law doctrines, and administrative court decisions to evaluate the interaction between legal norms and judicial interpretation. The findings indicate that AUPB has evolved into a significant normative standard within Indonesian administrative law, functioning not only as a complementary legal principle but also as an independent benchmark for reviewing administrative actions and decisions. Judicial practice demonstrates that AUPB serves as an instrument for assessing legality, controlling abuse of authority, guiding the exercise of discretion, and balancing legal certainty with substantive justice. The study also identifies challenges arising from interpretive variation, regulatory fragmentation, and differing judicial approaches to principle based adjudication. Strengthening doctrinal coherence, judicial capacity, and regulatory harmonization is essential for enhancing consistency in administrative adjudication. The research concludes that AUPB plays a central role in reinforcing administrative justice, governmental accountability, and the realization of good governance within the contemporary legal system.  
A Legal Analysis of The Bandung Administrative Court Decision No. 180/G/2024/Ptun.Bdg Regarding A Dispute Over The Transfer of Civil Servants from The Perspective of The General Principles of Good Governance Faza Pauzia Hermawan; Ifqi Maula Manaz; Sanabila Khairil Ahya; Siti Maharani; Taufiq Alamsyah
Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): June: Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/ha6jbq86

Abstract

This study examines the legality of Bandung Administrative Court Decision Number 180/G/2024/PTUN.BDG concerning a dispute over the transfer of a civil servant position through the perspective of the General Principles of Good Governance. The research employed a non empirical normative juridical approach based on statutory analysis, case analysis, and conceptual analysis. Primary sources consisted of the court decision and relevant Indonesian administrative law regulations governing state administrative justice, government administration, and the state civil apparatus. The findings indicate that the disputed transfer decision was issued by a competent authority but contained significant procedural and substantive defects. The court identified the use of an expired technical recommendation, administrative error, insufficient objective justification, and non compliance with merit based personnel management standards. These deficiencies resulted in violations of legal certainty and due care principles that form essential components of good governance. The analysis further demonstrates that the General Principles of Good Governance function as substantive standards for reviewing administrative discretion beyond formal legality. The decision strengthens judicial oversight, promotes bureaucratic accountability, reinforces merit system implementation, and contributes to the development of governance oriented administrative law in Indonesia.
THE ROLE OF WEST JAVA OMBUDSMAN REPRESENTATIVE IN SUPERVISING PUBLIC SERVICE AS VIEWED FROM SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH Mutiara Jihan Aziza; Chaerul Shaleh; Taufiq Alamsyah
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i1.6984

Abstract

Supervision of public services by the West Java Representative Ombudsman plays an important role in ensuring the quality of service and the protection of public rights. However, the implementation is still facing obstacles. This has an impact on the low effectiveness of supervision. In the perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah, supervision must uphold the principles of justice, transparency, and accountability according to sharia values. This research aims to analyze the stages of supervision by the Ombudsman, identify the obstacles faced, and review its implementation based on the principle of Siyasah Dusturiyah. The research method uses an empirical juridical approach with descriptive-qualitative. Data is collected through interviews, document studies and observations. Based on research, the obstacles experienced by the West Java Representative Ombudsman are caused by several factors. First, the limitation of human resources. The West Java Representative Ombudsman has only 15 members to supervise 22 regencies/cities. Furthermore, the low level of public participation, one of which is due to the unfamiliarity of the Ombudsman's name as a supervisory institution among the community.Keywords: Function, Service, Supervision, Siyasah Dusturiyah
The Siyasah Dusturiyyah Perspective on Personal Data Protection in Digital Public Services in Bandung Kidul District, Bandung City, Under Law Number 27 of 2022 Dwi Pandu Wijaksana; Yana Sutiana; Taufiq Alamsyah
Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies (April)
Publisher : Postgraduate Program of the State Islamic Institute of Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/jiis.v5i2.11701

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of personal data protection in digital public services at Bandung Kidul District, Bandung City, based on Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection from the perspective of Siyāsah Dustūriyyah. The research employs an empirical juridical approach using a case study method with a descriptive, analytical, and evaluative design. The findings indicate that Bandung Kidul District has implemented personal data protection through standard operating procedures (SOPs) for data management, awareness programs for government personnel, the provision of information to the public prior to data collection, and mitigation procedures in the event of a data breach. However, the implementation has not yet been fully effective due to several constraints, including limited technological infrastructure, budgetary resources, and human resource capacity. From the perspective of Siyāsah Dustūriyyah, personal data protection constitutes part of the government's fiduciary responsibility (amanah) to safeguard the public interest (maslahah) and to protect citizens' dignity and property. Therefore, strengthening technical regulations, enhancing the capacity of government officials, and providing adequate supporting infrastructure are essential to ensure the effective implementation of personal data protection at the district level..