Fazsya Tatra Khalia
Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Social Conflict Resolution and Collective Action in Contemporary Multicultural Societies Fazsya Tatra Khalia; Melva Noya; Edyanto Edyanto; Maudhy Satyadharma; Deford Cristy Birahy
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): :February: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studie
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/f9tj9075

Abstract

This study investigates how social conflict resolution practices interact with collective action dynamics in contemporary multicultural societies through an empirical mixed-methods design integrating survey modeling, interviews, and observational analysis. Quantitative findings reveal that perceived procedural fairness, identity negotiation competence, and institutional transparency significantly predict intergroup trust, collective efficacy, and sustained participation. Qualitative evidence demonstrates that dialogical mediation reframes conflict as a cooperative learning process, enabling participants to transform identity tension into shared civic engagement. The analysis identifies a recursive architecture in which culturally responsive conflict mechanisms, recognition-based identity framing, and adaptive institutional structures jointly stabilize collective cooperation. Structural models show that emotional regulation and legitimacy perceptions mediate the transition from disagreement to coordinated action, while narrative data illustrate how culturally grounded practices enhance resilience and participation continuity. The integrated interpretation positions conflict not as social breakdown but as a generative site of institutional learning and identity recalibration. The study contributes a multi-level framework explaining how multicultural societies sustain cooperation by embedding fairness, recognition, and reflexive governance into everyday conflict engagement.
Strategies for Addressing Non-Communicable Diseases: A Global Health Policy Analysis Based on WHO Publications Fazsya Tatra Khalia
Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases remain the leading cause of global mortality, yet policy responses vary significantly across countries, raising questions about how international health governance frameworks shape national strategies. This study examines how the World Health Organization conceptualizes and operationalizes NCD prevention through its normative publications, using a non-empirical qualitative policy analysis based on a structured review of WHO reports, action plans, and implementation frameworks published over the past fifteen years. Thematic coding and cross-document comparison were employed to identify dominant policy framings, implementation logics, and governance narratives embedded in these texts. The analysis finds that WHO strategies consistently prioritize structural prevention, institutional integration, and economic justification, framing chronic disease control as a development and governance issue rather than solely a biomedical one. Implementation guidance emphasizes adaptive diffusion, cost-effective interventions, and monitoring systems designed to institutionalize preventive policy. The study concludes that WHO publications operate as normative governance tools shaping how states define responsibility, allocate resources, and legitimize health interventions. These findings contribute to global health policy scholarship by demonstrating how international policy texts influence domestic reform trajectories through framing, institutional logic, and political economy narratives.