Rahmad Tri Hadi
UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Islamization and The Crisis Of Educational Dualism (Revisiting al-Faruqi’s Thought in the Context of Contemporary Muslim Societies) Susilawati Susilawati; Eliana Siregar; Rahmad Tri Hadi; Yahya Ibrahim
Edusoshum : Journal of Islamic Education and Social Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Ikatan Cendikiawan Ilmu Pendidikan Islam (ICIPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52366/edusoshum.v6i2.384

Abstract

The crisis of educational dualism based on the distinction of religious and secular sciences is one of the most urgent problems in the context of modern Islamic education. This problem leads to the epistemological division in Muslim communities and contributes to poor integration of ethical, religious, and scientific components in the process of educating students. This paper seeks to explore the ideas of Ismail Raji al-Faruqi on Islamization and integration of knowledge with the purpose of solving the problem of educational dualism. To conduct this study, the authors used a qualitative research design with the application of descriptive and contextual approaches. The data was gathered by means of documentation, including major works of al-Faruqi and related to Islamic educational reforms. The results demonstrate that educational dualism emerges as a result of colonial and secular educational traditions in separating religion and science. As a solution to the problem of educational dualism, al-Faruqi offers tawḥīd as a basis of knowledge that brings together all spheres, including religion, science, ethics, and others.
The The Ideological Dialectic Between Islam and the State in the Formulation of Indonesia’s State Principles: From Constitutional Compromise to Public Ethics: From Constitutional Compromise to Public Ethics Joni Harnedi; Danil Mahmud Chaniago; Rahmad Tri Hadi
Edusoshum : Journal of Islamic Education and Social Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Ikatan Cendikiawan Ilmu Pendidikan Islam (ICIPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52366/edusoshum.v6i2.553

Abstract

The linkage between Islam and the state in Indonesia has been analyzed in terms of history, constitution, and politics. Nonetheless, prior research has considered BPUPKI,  Piagam Jakarta (Jakarta Charter), and Constituent Assembly discussions as individual constitutional issues without understanding their interrelated ideologies. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the ideological negotiation between Islam and nationalism in the construction of Indonesia's state foundation through qualitative historical methodology of document analysis and political philosophy interpretation. Primary data includes BPUPKI and PPKI's discussion, Piagam Jakarta, and Constituent Assembly discussions with the help of secondary sources. The results demonstrate that the construction of the state foundation in Indonesia was an ideology-mediated process but not a constitutional one. Piagam Jakarta is the manifestation of constitutional compromise, whereas Constituent Assembly discussion represents the continuing reinterpretation of the relation between religion and the state in a pluralistic democracy. The author suggests the model of Indonesian Ideological Mediation that proves that the relationship between Islam and the state develops as a result of constitutional compromise, ideological mediation, and ethical transformation. Instead of instituting Islam as the basis of the state formally, the suggested model treats Islamic ideology as public ethics incorporated into Pancasila and constitutional democracy.  
From Coexistence to Cooperation: Religious Moderation, Civil Pluralism, and Interfaith Social Capital in Kampung Pondok Eliza; Duski Samad; Erwin; Khairul Fahmi; Rahmad Tri Hadi
Islam Realitas: Journal of Islamic and Social Studies Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/islam_realitas.v12i1.10973

Abstract

Religious moderation is increasingly promoted as a framework for managing religious diversity in Indonesia, yet its everyday grassroots practices remain underexplored. This study examines how religious moderation is constructed and sustained among Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, and Confucian communities in Kampung Pondok, Padang. Using a qualitative case study, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis. The findings show that religious moderation operates through two interconnected dimensions: preventive and constructive. The preventive dimension is reflected in inclusive social norms, mutual restraint, and informal mechanisms that reduce potential religious tensions. The constructive dimension emerges through interfaith dialogue, reciprocal assistance, collective responsibility, and sustained cultural interaction. These practices are reinforced by Minangkabau local wisdom, which strengthens civic pluralism, interpersonal trust, and interfaith social capital. The study argues that religious moderation functions not only as a mechanism for preventing conflict but also as a productive social process that transforms passive coexistence into active interfaith cooperation. This grassroots perspective offers insights into resilient religious pluralism in Indonesia and other diverse Southeast Asian societies.