Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Collegium Studiosum Journal
Gunawan Widjaja
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta Utara, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
MODEL KOLABORATIF PENCEGAHAN KEKERASAN BERBASIS PERMENDIKBUDRISTEK NO. 46 TAHUN 2023: PENDEKATAN AKSI-PARTISIPATIF Gunawan Widjaja; Wagiman Martedjo; Ignatius Bambang Sukarno Hatta
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i2.1835

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the implementation gaps of the Ministry of Education Regulation No. 46 of 2023 on the Prevention and Handling of Violence in Educational Institutions and to propose a collaborative model based on participatory action as an alternative solution. Using a descriptive qualitative method and normative legal approach, this study explores principles of education law, community participation, and the institutional effectiveness of schools in violence prevention. Findings reveal that the regulation’s implementation still faces structural and cultural challenges, including low regulatory literacy among educators and limited stakeholder engagement. The proposed collaborative model emphasizes stakeholder synergy through tiered training, participatory dialogue forums, strategic partnerships, and community-based evaluation. It is expected to contribute to the creation of a safe, inclusive, and just learning environment.
MENAKAR JURIMETRI DALAM SISTEM CIVIL LAW: ANALISIS TEORETIS DAN TANTANGAN PENERAPAN Gunawan Widjaja; Wagiman; Mesa Indra Naiborhu
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i2.1733

Abstract

The development of legal science has experienced a shift from a normative approach to an empirical approach, along with the increasing complexity of legal issues in society. jurimetri, as a quantitative approach to legal analysis, combines statistical and computational methods to understand patterns in court decisions and evaluate the effectiveness of regulations. Despite its rapid development in the common law system, its application in the civil law system still faces conceptual and practical challenges. The prescriptive nature of civil law and its reliance on codification are the main obstacles to adopting this method. This article discusses the extent to which jurimetrics can be applied in civil law legal systems, highlighting the fundamental differences between the two legal systems as well as the epistemological challenges that arise. The research utilizes a juridical-normative approach with a conceptual analysis of the relevance of jurimetrics in a written norm-based legal system. The results of the study show that although jurimetrics faces various obstacles, its application is still possible as a tool for legal analysis, especially in evaluating regulations, predicting legal trends, and increasing the efficiency of the justice system. Therefore, it is necessary to develop more flexible methods so that jurimetrics can contribute to the civil law legal system without sacrificing the principle of legal certainty.
MEMBANGUN GUGATAN YANG SAH: ANALISIS PENGARUH KEJELASAN OBJEK DAN PEMENUHAN UNSUR-UNSUR GUGATAN DALAM PROSES LITIGASI DI PENGADILAN NEGERI TANGERANG Gunawan Widjaja; Iriaty Khairul Ummah
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i2.1736

Abstract

A civil lawsuit serves as a formal legal instrument that must be systematically drafted in accordance with procedural and substantive requirements under Indonesian civil procedural law. This study aims to examine the essential elements of a valid lawsuit and to assess how the implementation of these requirements affects judicial decisions at the Tangerang District Court. The research employs a normative and empirical legal approach. Normative data were obtained through legal literature and statutory analysis, while empirical data were drawn from civil case decisions published in 2024 through the Case Tracking Information System (SIPP). The findings reveal that inconsistencies between the posita and petitum, along with unclear identification of the object of dispute, are the main reasons for lawsuits being declared inadmissible (niet ontvankelijk verklaard) or rejected. Out of 789 examined cases, 442 were granted, while 120 were dismissed as inadmissible and 16 were rejected. These outcomes reflect the significant impact of procedural compliance on case resolution and underscore the importance of technical precision in lawsuit drafting. The study affirms that drafting a coherent and complete lawsuit is not merely a procedural formality, but a vital component of legal accountability and access to justice. As such, strengthening the capacity of legal practitioners and law students in the formulation of civil lawsuits should be a key focus in legal education and professional development in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ignatius Bambang Sukarno Hatta Iriaty Khairul Ummah Mesa Indra Naiborhu Wagiman Wagiman Martedjo