Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies
Warda Mardiana Tambunan
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Hikmah dan Etika Ibadah Haji dalam QS. Al-Baqarah Ayat 197 Hilya Mahfuza; Edi Hermanto; Syifa Farizkha Indriani; Warda Mardiana Tambunan
Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): JANUARI
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/3c3xax40

Abstract

This study aims to examine the wisdom and ethical values of the Hajj pilgrimage as contained in QS. Al-Baqarah verse 197 and their relevance to the life of Muslims. The research employs a qualitative approach using a library research method. Data are obtained from the Qur’an, particularly QS. Al-Baqarah verse 197, the hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), as well as classical and contemporary Qur’anic commentaries, books on Hajj jurisprudence, and relevant Islamic literature. Data analysis is conducted through a descriptive-analytical method to explore the meanings, ethical principles, and spiritual values of Hajj, such as the prohibition of rafath, fusuq, and jidal, and the emphasis on piety (taqwa) as the best provision. The findings indicate that Hajj is not merely an individual ritual worship but also contains strong moral, spiritual, and social dimensions that encourage Muslims to develop both personal piety and social responsibility in their daily lives.
From Turāth to Digital Knowledge: Islamic Intellectual Traditions and the Future of Religious Learning Firdah Nailil Karimah; Ahmad Luthvan Habiburrahman; Warda Mardiana Tambunan; Jesimawati Jesimawati
Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies
Publisher : Bahtera Al Fikr Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.68051/ifkems.v1i1.40

Abstract

The study responds to the problem that Islamic knowledge is now accessed through digital libraries, online courses, social media platforms, mobile applications, searchable databases, and artificial intelligence-assisted tools, yet the epistemic and pedagogical consequences of this shift remain insufficiently theorized. Using a qualitative conceptual-interpretive design, the article combines conceptual analysis, hermeneutic textual interpretation, digital content analysis, and comparative media analysis of publicly accessible Islamic learning materials, digital platforms, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings show four main transformations. First, digital platforms re-mediate turāth into searchable, modular, and platform-dependent knowledge infrastructures. Second, digital learning environments reshape the classical relationship between text, teacher, learner, and institution by redistributing pedagogical authority across platforms, applications, learners, and digital publics. Third, digital Islamic knowledge expands access while also producing epistemic risks, including fragmentation, simplification, decontextualization, and weakened interpretive depth. Fourth, artificial intelligence-assisted religious learning raises future-oriented questions about source transparency, scholarly supervision, privacy, accountability, and ethical governance. The article contributes theoretically by integrating Islamic intellectual history, Islamic education, digital religion, mediatization theory, platform studies, and artificial intelligence ethics into a framework for understanding the future of religious learning. It argues that digital Islamic learning must be governed in ways that expand access while preserving the depth, plurality, discipline, and ethical responsibility of turāth.
Rethinking Islamic Public Reason for Plural Citizenship: Ethics, Law, and Social Cohesion in Muslim-Majority Societies Warda Mardiana Tambunan; Muhammad Jihad Azni Lubis; Dian Andini; Afifah Rabbaniyatul Ummah
Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies (July 2026)
Publisher : Bahtera Al Fikr Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.68051/ifkems.v1i2.44

Abstract

Religious pluralism in Muslim-majority societies raises a persistent question concerning how Islamic ethical and legal reasoning can contribute to public life without undermining equal citizenship, religious freedom, and social cohesion. This study aims to reconstruct Islamic public reason as a normative and institutional framework for plural citizenship by examining how religious identity, legal authority, minority recognition, and state coercion are formulated across different constitutional settings. It employs qualitative comparative document analysis, directed content analysis, and comparative normative interpretation of constitutional texts, judicial decisions, international human-rights instruments, and Islamic declarations relating to Indonesia, Morocco, and Tunisia. The findings demonstrate, first, that these states exhibit constitutional hybridity rather than a simple Islamic–secular divide, combining religious commitments with equality, freedom, national sovereignty, and cultural plurality. Second, Islamic normativity cannot be equated with state-enforceable law, because theological truth, moral obligation, juristic judgment, and coercive legislation represent distinct forms of authority. Third, plural citizenship requires more than formal nationality or passive toleration; it depends on equal administrative recognition and effective opportunities to challenge public classifications and decisions. Fourth, social cohesion is more sustainably generated through accountable disagreement than through enforced religious uniformity. On this basis, the study proposes an Islamic Public Reason Framework for Plural Citizenship comprising normative openness, reciprocal civic justification, differentiated legal authority, and institutional contestability. The framework advances Islamic and Islamicate scholarship by preserving the public relevance of Islamic ethical reasoning while requiring every exercise of coercive authority to remain proportionate, reviewable, and accountable to citizens as political equals.
Co-Authors Afifah Rabbaniyatul Ummah Ahmad Luthvan Habiburrahman Dian Andini Edi Hermanto Firdah Nailil Karimah Hilya Mahfuza Jesimawati Jesimawati Muhammad Jihad Azni Lubis Syifa Farizkha Indriani