Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies
Muhammad Jihad Azni Lubis
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Psikologi Pendidikan Anak dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Wahbah Az zuhaili dalam Tafsir Al-Munir Muhammad Jihad Azni Lubis; Ahmad Zuhri; Nurussakinah Daulay
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/b2y0dj58

Abstract

This article examines the Qur'anic framework for children's development from dependents requiring parental care and protection into individuals capable of exercising moral agency and ethical responsibility. It addresses a tendency in Islamic parenting scholarship to emphasize parental obligations, protection, discipline, and obedience without adequately integrating children's developing capacities, privacy, self-regulation, value internalization, and the gradual transfer of responsibility into a coherent conceptual framework. The study aims to explain this developmental process and interpret isti'dhān as part of forming children's awareness of interpersonal boundaries and moral agency. It employs a qualitative textual design combining thematic-conceptual Qur'anic interpretation with qualitative content analysis, focusing on Q.S. al-Baqarah [2]: 233, Q.S. al-Nūr [24]: 58–59, and Q.S. Luqmān [31]: 12–19, analyzed through textual, contextual, and intratextual readings, thematic coding, and engagement with theories of moral development, privacy, and child agency. Findings identify four interconnected dimensions of Qur'anic parenting: relational protection and fulfillment of children's needs, habituation in respecting privacy and interpersonal boundaries, transformation of obedience into moral internalization, and formation of agency through self-regulation and social responsibility. The study conceptualizes Qur'anic moral agency as a relational, gradual, and accountable capacity grounded in trust, welfare, dignity, and responsibility before God, contributing a unified Qur'an-based model integrating parenting, privacy, capacity development, and ethical responsibility.
Rethinking Islamic Public Reason for Plural Citizenship: Ethics, Law, and Social Cohesion in Muslim-Majority Societies Warda Mardiana Tambunan; Muhammad Jihad Azni Lubis; Dian Andini; Afifah Rabbaniyatul Ummah
Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Islamicate Futures: Knowledge, Ethics, and Muslim Societies (July 2026)
Publisher : Bahtera Al Fikr Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.68051/ifkems.v1i2.44

Abstract

Religious pluralism in Muslim-majority societies raises a persistent question concerning how Islamic ethical and legal reasoning can contribute to public life without undermining equal citizenship, religious freedom, and social cohesion. This study aims to reconstruct Islamic public reason as a normative and institutional framework for plural citizenship by examining how religious identity, legal authority, minority recognition, and state coercion are formulated across different constitutional settings. It employs qualitative comparative document analysis, directed content analysis, and comparative normative interpretation of constitutional texts, judicial decisions, international human-rights instruments, and Islamic declarations relating to Indonesia, Morocco, and Tunisia. The findings demonstrate, first, that these states exhibit constitutional hybridity rather than a simple Islamic–secular divide, combining religious commitments with equality, freedom, national sovereignty, and cultural plurality. Second, Islamic normativity cannot be equated with state-enforceable law, because theological truth, moral obligation, juristic judgment, and coercive legislation represent distinct forms of authority. Third, plural citizenship requires more than formal nationality or passive toleration; it depends on equal administrative recognition and effective opportunities to challenge public classifications and decisions. Fourth, social cohesion is more sustainably generated through accountable disagreement than through enforced religious uniformity. On this basis, the study proposes an Islamic Public Reason Framework for Plural Citizenship comprising normative openness, reciprocal civic justification, differentiated legal authority, and institutional contestability. The framework advances Islamic and Islamicate scholarship by preserving the public relevance of Islamic ethical reasoning while requiring every exercise of coercive authority to remain proportionate, reviewable, and accountable to citizens as political equals.
Co-Authors Afifah Rabbaniyatul Ummah Ahmad Zuhri Dian Andini Nurussakinah Daulay Daulay Warda Mardiana Tambunan